» Articles » PMID: 27377652

The Cell Ontology 2016: Enhanced Content, Modularization, and Ontology Interoperability

Abstract

Background: The Cell Ontology (CL) is an OBO Foundry candidate ontology covering the domain of canonical, natural biological cell types. Since its inception in 2005, the CL has undergone multiple rounds of revision and expansion, most notably in its representation of hematopoietic cells. For in vivo cells, the CL focuses on vertebrates but provides general classes that can be used for other metazoans, which can be subtyped in species-specific ontologies.

Construction And Content: Recent work on the CL has focused on extending the representation of various cell types, and developing new modules in the CL itself, and in related ontologies in coordination with the CL. For example, the Kidney and Urinary Pathway Ontology was used as a template to populate the CL with additional cell types. In addition, subtypes of the class 'cell in vitro' have received improved definitions and labels to provide for modularity with the representation of cells in the Cell Line Ontology and Reagent Ontology. Recent changes in the ontology development methodology for CL include a switch from OBO to OWL for the primary encoding of the ontology, and an increasing reliance on logical definitions for improved reasoning.

Utility And Discussion: The CL is now mandated as a metadata standard for large functional genomics and transcriptomics projects, and is used extensively for annotation, querying, and analyses of cell type specific data in sequencing consortia such as FANTOM5 and ENCODE, as well as for the NIAID ImmPort database and the Cell Image Library. The CL is also a vital component used in the modular construction of other biomedical ontologies-for example, the Gene Ontology and the cross-species anatomy ontology, Uberon, use CL to support the consistent representation of cell types across different levels of anatomical granularity, such as tissues and organs.

Conclusions: The ongoing improvements to the CL make it a valuable resource to both the OBO Foundry community and the wider scientific community, and we continue to experience increased interest in the CL both among developers and within the user community.

Citing Articles

SwarmMAP: Swarm Learning for Decentralized Cell Type Annotation in Single Cell Sequencing Data.

Saldanha O, Goepp V, Pfeiffer K, Kim H, Zhu J, Kramann R bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39868099 PMC: 11761033. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.13.632775.


A change language for ontologies and knowledge graphs.

Hegde H, Vendetti J, Goutte-Gattat D, Caufield J, Graybeal J, Harris N Database (Oxford). 2025; 2025.

PMID: 39841813 PMC: 11753292. DOI: 10.1093/database/baae133.


Standardized pipelines support and facilitate integration of diverse datasets at the Rat Genome Database.

Smith J, Tutaj M, Thota J, Lamers L, Gibson A, Kundurthi A Database (Oxford). 2025; 2025.

PMID: 39841812 PMC: 11753291. DOI: 10.1093/database/baae132.


Construction, Deployment, and Usage of the Human Reference Atlas Knowledge Graph for Linked Open Data.

Bueckle A, Herr 2nd B, Herr B, Hardi J, Quardokus E, Musen M bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39764040 PMC: 11703146. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.22.630006.


A general strategy for generating expert-guided, simplified views of ontologies.

Caron A, Puig-Barbe A, Quardokus E, Balhoff J, Belfiore J, Chipampe N bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39763856 PMC: 11702530. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.13.628309.


References
1.
Forrest A, Kawaji H, Rehli M, Baillie J, de Hoon M, Haberle V . A promoter-level mammalian expression atlas. Nature. 2014; 507(7493):462-70. PMC: 4529748. DOI: 10.1038/nature13182. View

2.
Mungall C, Bada M, Berardini T, Deegan J, Ireland A, Harris M . Cross-product extensions of the Gene Ontology. J Biomed Inform. 2010; 44(1):80-6. PMC: 2910209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.02.002. View

3.
Mungall C, Washington N, Nguyen-Xuan J, Condit C, Smedley D, Kohler S . Use of model organism and disease databases to support matchmaking for human disease gene discovery. Hum Mutat. 2015; 36(10):979-84. PMC: 5473253. DOI: 10.1002/humu.22857. View

4.
Alam-Faruque Y, Hill D, Dimmer E, Harris M, Foulger R, Tweedie S . Representing kidney development using the gene ontology. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e99864. PMC: 4062467. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099864. View

5.
Bard J, Rhee S, Ashburner M . An ontology for cell types. Genome Biol. 2005; 6(2):R21. PMC: 551541. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2005-6-2-r21. View