» Articles » PMID: 24139062

The Drosophila Anatomy Ontology

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2013 Oct 22
PMID 24139062
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Anatomy ontologies are query-able classifications of anatomical structures. They provide a widely-used means for standardising the annotation of phenotypes and expression in both human-readable and programmatically accessible forms. They are also frequently used to group annotations in biologically meaningful ways. Accurate annotation requires clear textual definitions for terms, ideally accompanied by images. Accurate grouping and fruitful programmatic usage requires high-quality formal definitions that can be used to automate classification and check for errors. The Drosophila anatomy ontology (DAO) consists of over 8000 classes with broad coverage of Drosophila anatomy. It has been used extensively for annotation by a range of resources, but until recently it was poorly formalised and had few textual definitions.

Results: We have transformed the DAO into an ontology rich in formal and textual definitions in which the majority of classifications are automated and extensive error checking ensures quality. Here we present an overview of the content of the DAO, the patterns used in its formalisation, and the various uses it has been put to.

Conclusions: As a result of the work described here, the DAO provides a high-quality, queryable reference for the wild-type anatomy of Drosophila melanogaster and a set of terms to annotate data related to that anatomy. Extensive, well referenced textual definitions make it both a reliable and useful reference and ensure accurate use in annotation. Wide use of formal axioms allows a large proportion of classification to be automated and the use of consistency checking to eliminate errors. This increased formalisation has resulted in significant improvements to the completeness and accuracy of classification. The broad use of both formal and informal definitions make further development of the ontology sustainable and scalable. The patterns of formalisation used in the DAO are likely to be useful to developers of other anatomy ontologies.

Citing Articles

A general strategy for generating expert-guided, simplified views of ontologies.

Caron A, Puig-Barbe A, Quardokus E, Balhoff J, Belfiore J, Chipampe N bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39763856 PMC: 11702530. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.13.628309.


Pervasive tissue-, genetic background-, and allele-specific gene expression effects in Drosophila melanogaster.

Glaser-Schmitt A, Lemoine M, Kaltenpoth M, Parsch J PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(8):e1011257.

PMID: 39178312 PMC: 11376557. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011257.


Uncertainty-aware single-cell annotation with a hierarchical reject option.

Theunissen L, Mortier T, Saeys Y, Waegeman W Bioinformatics. 2024; 40(3).

PMID: 38441258 PMC: 10957513. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae128.


A revised terminology for male genitalia in Hymenoptera (Insecta), with a special emphasis on Ichneumonoidea.

Pos D, Miko I, Talamas E, Vilhelmsen L, Sharanowski B PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15874.

PMID: 37868054 PMC: 10588719. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15874.


The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2023.

Balhoff J, Carbon S, Ebert D, Gaudet P, Harris N, Mi H Genetics. 2023; 224(1).

PMID: 36866529 PMC: 10158837. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyad031.


References
1.
Mungall C, Bada M, Berardini T, Deegan J, Ireland A, Harris M . Cross-product extensions of the Gene Ontology. J Biomed Inform. 2010; 44(1):80-6. PMC: 2910209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.02.002. View

2.
Grumbling G, Strelets V . FlyBase: anatomical data, images and queries. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 34(Database issue):D484-8. PMC: 1347431. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkj068. View

3.
Jupp S, Horridge M, Iannone L, Klein J, Owen S, Schanstra J . Populous: a tool for building OWL ontologies from templates. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012; 13 Suppl 1:S5. PMC: 3471341. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-S1-S5. View

4.
Gkoutos G, Green E, Mallon A, Blake A, Greenaway S, Hancock J . Ontologies for the description of mouse phenotypes. Comp Funct Genomics. 2008; 5(6-7):545-51. PMC: 2447424. DOI: 10.1002/cfg.430. View

5.
Engel S, Balakrishnan R, Binkley G, Christie K, Costanzo M, Dwight S . Saccharomyces Genome Database provides mutant phenotype data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 38(Database issue):D433-6. PMC: 2808950. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp917. View