» Articles » PMID: 23396282

Critical Assessment of Automated Flow Cytometry Data Analysis Techniques

Overview
Journal Nat Methods
Date 2013 Feb 12
PMID 23396282
Citations 220
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Traditional methods for flow cytometry (FCM) data processing rely on subjective manual gating. Recently, several groups have developed computational methods for identifying cell populations in multidimensional FCM data. The Flow Cytometry: Critical Assessment of Population Identification Methods (FlowCAP) challenges were established to compare the performance of these methods on two tasks: (i) mammalian cell population identification, to determine whether automated algorithms can reproduce expert manual gating and (ii) sample classification, to determine whether analysis pipelines can identify characteristics that correlate with external variables (such as clinical outcome). This analysis presents the results of the first FlowCAP challenges. Several methods performed well as compared to manual gating or external variables using statistical performance measures, which suggests that automated methods have reached a sufficient level of maturity and accuracy for reliable use in FCM data analysis.

Citing Articles

Machine Learning Methods in Clinical Flow Cytometry.

Spies N, Rangel A, English P, Morrison M, OFallon B, Ng D Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941850 PMC: 11816335. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030483.


Automated cytometric gating with human-level performance using bivariate segmentation.

Chen J, Ionita M, Feng Y, Lu Y, Orzechowski P, Garai S Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1576.

PMID: 39939580 PMC: 11821879. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56622-2.


Deciphering cellular complexity: advances and future directions in single-cell protein analysis.

Zhao Q, Li S, Krall L, Li Q, Sun R, Yin Y Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 12:1507460.

PMID: 39877263 PMC: 11772399. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1507460.


Unveiling the power of high-dimensional cytometry data with cyCONDOR.

Kroger C, Muller S, Leidner J, Krober T, Warnat-Herresthal S, Spintge J Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10702.

PMID: 39702306 PMC: 11659560. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55179-w.


Evaluating Strategies to Assess the Differentiation Potential of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: A Review, Analysis and Call for Innovation.

Smith L, Quelch-Cliffe R, Liu F, Aguilar A, Przyborski S Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2024; 21(1):107-125.

PMID: 39340737 PMC: 11762643. DOI: 10.1007/s12015-024-10793-5.


References
1.
Aghaeepour N, Chattopadhyay P, Ganesan A, ONeill K, Zare H, Jalali A . Early immunologic correlates of HIV protection can be identified from computational analysis of complex multivariate T-cell flow cytometry assays. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(7):1009-16. PMC: 3315712. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts082. View

2.
Lee J, Spidlen J, Boyce K, Cai J, Crosbie N, Dalphin M . MIFlowCyt: the minimum information about a Flow Cytometry Experiment. Cytometry A. 2008; 73(10):926-30. PMC: 2773297. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20623. View

3.
Ge Y, Sealfon S . flowPeaks: a fast unsupervised clustering for flow cytometry data via K-means and density peak finding. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(15):2052-8. PMC: 3400953. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts300. View

4.
Baumgarth N, Roederer M . A practical approach to multicolor flow cytometry for immunophenotyping. J Immunol Methods. 2000; 243(1-2):77-97. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1759(00)00229-5. View

5.
Naumann U, Luta G, Wand M . The curvHDR method for gating flow cytometry samples. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010; 11:44. PMC: 2832899. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-44. View