» Articles » PMID: 24670763

An Atlas of Active Enhancers Across Human Cell Types and Tissues

Abstract

Enhancers control the correct temporal and cell-type-specific activation of gene expression in multicellular eukaryotes. Knowing their properties, regulatory activity and targets is crucial to understand the regulation of differentiation and homeostasis. Here we use the FANTOM5 panel of samples, covering the majority of human tissues and cell types, to produce an atlas of active, in vivo-transcribed enhancers. We show that enhancers share properties with CpG-poor messenger RNA promoters but produce bidirectional, exosome-sensitive, relatively short unspliced RNAs, the generation of which is strongly related to enhancer activity. The atlas is used to compare regulatory programs between different cells at unprecedented depth, to identify disease-associated regulatory single nucleotide polymorphisms, and to classify cell-type-specific and ubiquitous enhancers. We further explore the utility of enhancer redundancy, which explains gene expression strength rather than expression patterns. The online FANTOM5 enhancer atlas represents a unique resource for studies on cell-type-specific enhancers and gene regulation.

Citing Articles

Cell type-dependent directional transcription at enhancers.

Agrawal S, Kanamaru E, Saito Y, Ishikawa F, de Hoon M NAR Genom Bioinform. 2025; 7(1):lqaf007.

PMID: 40060372 PMC: 11886823. DOI: 10.1093/nargab/lqaf007.


Accurate transcription unit annotation from run-on and sequencing data.

Munn P, Chia J, Danko C bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40027686 PMC: 11870431. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.12.637853.


BTS: scalable Bayesian Tissue Score for prioritizing GWAS variants and their functional contexts across omics data.

Kuksa P, Ionita M, Carter L, Cifello J, Clark K, Valladares O bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39975395 PMC: 11838512. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.30.621077.


Transcriptional enhancers in human neuronal differentiation provide clues to neuronal disorders.

Yoshihara M, Coschiera A, Bachmann J, Pucci M, Li H, Bhagat S EMBO Rep. 2025; 26(5):1212-1237.

PMID: 39948187 PMC: 11893885. DOI: 10.1038/s44319-025-00372-1.


Prioritizing effector genes at trait-associated loci using multimodal evidence.

Schipper M, de Leeuw C, Maciel B, Wightman D, Hubers N, Boomsma D Nat Genet. 2025; 57(2):323-333.

PMID: 39930082 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-025-02084-7.


References
1.
Huang D, Sherman B, Lempicki R . Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009; 4(1):44-57. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211. View

2.
Chepelev I, Wei G, Wangsa D, Tang Q, Zhao K . Characterization of genome-wide enhancer-promoter interactions reveals co-expression of interacting genes and modes of higher order chromatin organization. Cell Res. 2012; 22(3):490-503. PMC: 3292289. DOI: 10.1038/cr.2012.15. View

3.
Ostuni R, Piccolo V, Barozzi I, Polletti S, Termanini A, Bonifacio S . Latent enhancers activated by stimulation in differentiated cells. Cell. 2013; 152(1-2):157-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.018. View

4.
Kowalczyk M, Hughes J, Garrick D, Lynch M, Sharpe J, Sloane-Stanley J . Intragenic enhancers act as alternative promoters. Mol Cell. 2012; 45(4):447-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.021. View

5.
Carninci P, Sandelin A, Lenhard B, Katayama S, Shimokawa K, Ponjavic J . Genome-wide analysis of mammalian promoter architecture and evolution. Nat Genet. 2006; 38(6):626-35. DOI: 10.1038/ng1789. View