» Articles » PMID: 39415214

Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation of Ontologies Using Artificial Intelligence (DRAGON-AI)

Abstract

Background: Ontologies are fundamental components of informatics infrastructure in domains such as biomedical, environmental, and food sciences, representing consensus knowledge in an accurate and computable form. However, their construction and maintenance demand substantial resources and necessitate substantial collaboration between domain experts, curators, and ontology experts. We present Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation of Ontologies using AI (DRAGON-AI), an ontology generation method employing Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). DRAGON-AI can generate textual and logical ontology components, drawing from existing knowledge in multiple ontologies and unstructured text sources.

Results: We assessed performance of DRAGON-AI on de novo term construction across ten diverse ontologies, making use of extensive manual evaluation of results. Our method has high precision for relationship generation, but has slightly lower precision than from logic-based reasoning. Our method is also able to generate definitions deemed acceptable by expert evaluators, but these scored worse than human-authored definitions. Notably, evaluators with the highest level of confidence in a domain were better able to discern flaws in AI-generated definitions. We also demonstrated the ability of DRAGON-AI to incorporate natural language instructions in the form of GitHub issues.

Conclusions: These findings suggest DRAGON-AI's potential to substantially aid the manual ontology construction process. However, our results also underscore the importance of having expert curators and ontology editors drive the ontology generation process.

Citing Articles

Assessing the performance of generative artificial intelligence in retrieving information against manually curated genetic and genomic data.

Poretsky E, Blake V, Andorf C, Sen T Database (Oxford). 2025; 2025.

PMID: 39963877 PMC: 11833239. DOI: 10.1093/database/baaf011.


A change language for ontologies and knowledge graphs.

Hegde H, Vendetti J, Goutte-Gattat D, Caufield J, Graybeal J, Harris N Database (Oxford). 2025; 2025.

PMID: 39841813 PMC: 11753292. DOI: 10.1093/database/baae133.


Toward clearer recognition and easier usefulness: development of a cross-lingual atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease ontology.

Ma H, Shen L, Wang J, Wang S, Wang M, Wang M Database (Oxford). 2024; 2024.

PMID: 39657146 PMC: 11630243. DOI: 10.1093/database/baae117.


The text2term tool to map free-text descriptions of biomedical terms to ontologies.

Goncalves R, Payne J, Tan A, Benitez C, Haddock J, Gentleman R Database (Oxford). 2024; 2024.

PMID: 39607847 PMC: 11604108. DOI: 10.1093/database/baae119.

References
1.
Gillis J, Pavlidis P . Characterizing the state of the art in the computational assignment of gene function: lessons from the first critical assessment of functional annotation (CAFA). BMC Bioinformatics. 2013; 14 Suppl 3:S15. PMC: 3633048. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-s3-s15. View

2.
Malkov Y, Yashunin D . Efficient and Robust Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search Using Hierarchical Navigable Small World Graphs. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2019; 42(4):824-836. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2889473. View

3.
Kohler S, Doelken S, Mungall C, Bauer S, Firth H, Bailleul-Forestier I . The Human Phenotype Ontology project: linking molecular biology and disease through phenotype data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 42(Database issue):D966-74. PMC: 3965098. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1026. View

4.
Buttigieg P, Pafilis E, Lewis S, Schildhauer M, Walls R, Mungall C . The environment ontology in 2016: bridging domains with increased scope, semantic density, and interoperation. J Biomed Semantics. 2016; 7(1):57. PMC: 5035502. DOI: 10.1186/s13326-016-0097-6. View

5.
Noy S, Zhang W . Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science. 2023; 381(6654):187-192. DOI: 10.1126/science.adh2586. View