» Articles » PMID: 15632085

Comparative Genome Sequencing of Drosophila Pseudoobscura: Chromosomal, Gene, and Cis-element Evolution

Abstract

We have sequenced the genome of a second Drosophila species, Drosophila pseudoobscura, and compared this to the genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster, a primary model organism. Throughout evolution the vast majority of Drosophila genes have remained on the same chromosome arm, but within each arm gene order has been extensively reshuffled, leading to a minimum of 921 syntenic blocks shared between the species. A repetitive sequence is found in the D. pseudoobscura genome at many junctions between adjacent syntenic blocks. Analysis of this novel repetitive element family suggests that recombination between offset elements may have given rise to many paracentric inversions, thereby contributing to the shuffling of gene order in the D. pseudoobscura lineage. Based on sequence similarity and synteny, 10,516 putative orthologs have been identified as a core gene set conserved over 25-55 million years (Myr) since the pseudoobscura/melanogaster divergence. Genes expressed in the testes had higher amino acid sequence divergence than the genome-wide average, consistent with the rapid evolution of sex-specific proteins. Cis-regulatory sequences are more conserved than random and nearby sequences between the species--but the difference is slight, suggesting that the evolution of cis-regulatory elements is flexible. Overall, a pattern of repeat-mediated chromosomal rearrangement, and high coadaptation of both male genes and cis-regulatory sequences emerges as important themes of genome divergence between these species of Drosophila.

Citing Articles

Response of fruit fly () to diet manipulation of nutrient density.

Novak T, Billings K, Ellis S, Smith M, Wills B, Stevison L Physiol Entomol. 2024; 49(4):412-421.

PMID: 39583217 PMC: 11584062. DOI: 10.1111/phen.12459.


Testis- and ovary-expressed polo-like kinase transcripts and gene duplications affect male fertility when expressed in the Drosophila melanogaster germline.

Najera P, Dratler O, Mai A, Elizarraras M, Vanchinathan R, Gonzales C G3 (Bethesda). 2024; 15(1.

PMID: 39566185 PMC: 11708218. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae273.


Development and evolution of Drosophila chromatin landscape in a 3D genome context.

Ali M, Younas L, Liu J, He H, Zhang X, Zhou Q Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9452.

PMID: 39487148 PMC: 11530545. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53892-0.


The origin and maintenance of supergenes contributing to ecological adaptation in Atlantic herring.

Jamsandekar M, Ferreira M, Pettersson M, Farrell E, Davis B, Andersson L Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9136.

PMID: 39443489 PMC: 11499932. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53079-7.


Genomics of natural populations: gene conversion events reveal selected genes within the inversions of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Schaeffer S, Richards S, Fuller Z G3 (Bethesda). 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39073776 PMC: 11457094. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae176.


References
1.
Russo C, Takezaki N, Nei M . Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of drosophilid species. Mol Biol Evol. 1995; 12(3):391-404. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040214. View

2.
Saitou N, Nei M . The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987; 4(4):406-25. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. View

3.
PAINTER T . A New Method for the Study of Chromosome Aberrations and the Plotting of Chromosome Maps in Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1934; 19(3):175-88. PMC: 1208478. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/19.3.175. View

4.
Petrov D, Hartl D . High rate of DNA loss in the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis species groups. Mol Biol Evol. 1998; 15(3):293-302. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025926. View

5.
Ludwig M, Patel N, Kreitman M . Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila: rules governing conservation and change. Development. 1998; 125(5):949-58. DOI: 10.1242/dev.125.5.949. View