How Malleable is the Eukaryotic Genome? Extreme Rate of Chromosomal Rearrangement in the Genus Drosophila

Overview

Journal Genome Res

Specialty Genetics

Date 2001 Feb 7

PMID 11157786

Citations 77

Authors

J M Ranz

F Casals

A Ruiz

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

During the evolution of the genus Drosophila, the molecular organization of the major chromosomal elements has been repeatedly rearranged via the fixation of paracentric inversions. Little detailed information is available, however, on the extent and effect of these changes at the molecular level. In principle, a full description of the rate and pattern of change could reveal the limits, if any, to which the eukaryotic genome can accommodate reorganizations. We have constructed a high-density physical map of the largest chromosomal element in Drosophila repleta (chromosome 2) and compared the order and distances between the markers with those on the homologous chromosomal element (3R) in Drosophila melanogaster. The two species belong to different subgenera (Drosophila and Sophophora, respectively), which diverged 40-62 million years (Myr) ago and represent, thus, the farthest lineages within the Drosophila genus. The comparison reveals extensive reshuffling of gene order from centromere to telomere. Using a maximum likelihood method, we estimate that 114 +/- 14 paracentric inversions have been fixed in this chromosomal element since the divergence of the two species, that is, 0.9-1.4 inversions fixed per Myr. Comparison with available rates of chromosomal evolution, taking into account genome size, indicates that the Drosophila genome shows the highest rate found so far in any eukaryote. Twenty-one small segments (23-599 kb) comprising at least two independent (nonoverlapping) markers appear to be conserved between D. melanogaster and D. repleta. These results are consistent with the random breakage model and do not provide significant evidence of functional constraint of any kind. They support the notion that the Drosophila genome is extraordinarily malleable and has a modular organization. The high rate of chromosomal change also suggests a very limited transferability of the positional information from the Drosophila genome to other insects.

Citing Articles

De Novo Emerged Gene Search in Eukaryotes with DENSE.

Roginski P, Grandchamp A, Quignot C, Lopes A Genome Biol Evol. 2024; 16(8).

PMID: 39212967 PMC: 11363675. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evae159.

Ribosomal Protein Cluster Organization in Asgard Archaea.

Tirumalai M, Sivaraman Jr R, Kutty L, Song E, Fox G Archaea. 2024; 2023:5512414.

PMID: 38314098 PMC: 10833476. DOI: 10.1155/2023/5512414.

Cytological heterogeneity of heterochromatin among 10 sequenced Drosophila species.

Marchetti M, Piacentini L, Berloco M, Casale A, Cappucci U, Pimpinelli S Genetics. 2022; 222(2).

PMID: 35946576 PMC: 9526073. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac119.

Highly contiguous assemblies of 101 drosophilid genomes.

Kim B, Wang J, Miller D, Barmina O, Delaney E, Thompson A Elife. 2021; 10.

PMID: 34279216 PMC: 8337076. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.66405.

High-quality chromosome-level genome assembly and full-length transcriptome analysis of the pharaoh ant Monomorium pharaonis.

Gao Q, Xiong Z, Larsen R, Zhou L, Zhao J, Ding G Gigascience. 2020; 9(12).

PMID: 33319913 PMC: 7736795. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giaa143.

References

Schibler L, Vaiman D, Oustry A, Giraud-Delville C, Cribiu E . Comparative gene mapping: a fine-scale survey of chromosome rearrangements between ruminants and humans. Genome Res. 1998; 8(9):901-15. DOI: 10.1101/gr.8.9.901. View

Caceres M, Barbadilla A, Ruiz A . INVERSION LENGTH AND BREAKPOINT DISTRIBUTION IN THE DROSOPHILA BUZZATII SPECIES COMPLEX: IS INVERSION LENGTH A SELECTED TRAIT?. Evolution. 2017; 51(4):1149-1155. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb03962.x. View

LUNDIN L . Evolution of the vertebrate genome as reflected in paralogous chromosomal regions in man and the house mouse. Genomics. 1993; 16(1):1-19. DOI: 10.1006/geno.1993.1133. View

STURTEVANT A, Novitski E . The Homologies of the Chromosome Elements in the Genus Drosophila. Genetics. 1941; 26(5):517-41. PMC: 1209144. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/26.5.517. View

Vieira J, Vieira C, Hartl D, Lozovskaya E . Discordant rates of chromosome evolution in the Drosophila virilis species group. Genetics. 1997; 147(1):223-30. PMC: 1208106. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/147.1.223. View

Ehrlich J, Sankoff D, Nadeau J . Synteny conservation and chromosome rearrangements during mammalian evolution. Genetics. 1997; 147(1):289-96. PMC: 1208112. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/147.1.289. View

Friedrich M, Tautz D . An episodic change of rDNA nucleotide substitution rate has occurred during the emergence of the insect order Diptera. Mol Biol Evol. 1997; 14(6):644-53. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025804. View

Russo C, Takezaki N, Nei M . Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of drosophilid species. Mol Biol Evol. 1995; 12(3):391-404. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040214. View

Johansson M, Ellegren H, Andersson L . Comparative mapping reveals extensive linkage conservation--but with gene order rearrangements--between the pig and the human genomes. Genomics. 1995; 25(3):682-90. DOI: 10.1016/0888-7543(95)80011-a. View

10.

Livingstone K, Lackney V, Blauth J, van Wijk R, Jahn M . Genome mapping in capsicum and the evolution of genome structure in the solanaceae. Genetics. 1999; 152(3):1183-202. PMC: 1460652. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/152.3.1183. View

11.

Matthews T, Munstermann L . CHROMOSOMAL REPATTERNING AND LINKAGE GROUP CONSERVATION IN MOSQUITO KARYOTYPIC EVOLUTION. Evolution. 2017; 48(1):146-154. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01301.x. View

12.

Peters F, Lubsen N, Walldorf U, Moormann R, Hovemann B . The unusual structure of heat shock locus 2-48B in Drosophila hydei. Mol Gen Genet. 1984; 197(3):392-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF00329934. View

13.

Gould A, Morrison A, Sproat G, White R, Krumlauf R . Positive cross-regulation and enhancer sharing: two mechanisms for specifying overlapping Hox expression patterns. Genes Dev. 1997; 11(7):900-13. DOI: 10.1101/gad.11.7.900. View

14.

Steinemann M . Analysis of chromosomal homologies between two species of the subgenus Sophophora: D. miranda and D. melanogaster using cloned DNA segments. Chromosoma. 1982; 87(1):77-88. DOI: 10.1007/BF00333510. View

15.

Gaut B, Doebley J . DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(13):6809-14. PMC: 21240. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.13.6809. View

16.

Janke A, Thomas W, Von Haeseler A, Paabo S . The marsupial mitochondrial genome and the evolution of placental mammals. Genetics. 1994; 137(1):243-56. PMC: 1205941. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/137.1.243. View

17.

Segarra C, Aguade M . Molecular organization of the X chromosome in different species of the obscura group of Drosophila. Genetics. 1992; 130(3):513-21. PMC: 1204869. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/130.3.513. View

18.

Ono S . Ancient linkage groups and frozen accidents. Nature. 1973; 244(5414):259-62. DOI: 10.1038/244259a0. View

19.

. FlyBase: the Drosophila database. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996; 24(1):53-6. PMC: 145580. DOI: 10.1093/nar/24.1.53. View

20.

Segarra C, Ribo G, Aguade M . Differentiation of Muller's chromosomal elements D and E in the obscura group of Drosophila. Genetics. 1996; 144(1):139-46. PMC: 1207487. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/144.1.139. View