» Articles » PMID: 35694744

The Relevance of Chromatin Architecture to Genome Rearrangements in

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Jun 13
PMID 35694744
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

DNA within chromosomes in the nucleus is non-randomly organized into chromosome territories, compartments and topologically associated domains (TADs). Chromosomal rearrangements have the potential to alter chromatin organization and modify gene expression leading to selection against these structural variants. has a wealth of naturally occurring gene arrangements that were generated by overlapping inversion mutations caused by two chromosomal breaks that rejoin the central region in reverse order. Unlike humans, inversion heterozygotes do not have negative effects associated with crossing over during meiosis because males use achiasmate mechanisms for proper segregation, and aberrant recombinant meiotic products generated in females are lost in polar bodies. As a result, populations are found to harbour extensive inversion polymorphisms. It is not clear, however, whether chromatin architecture constrains which inversions breakpoints persist in populations. We mapped the breakpoints of seven inversions in to the TAD map to determine if persisting inversion breakpoints are more likely to occur at boundaries between TADs. Our results show that breakpoints occur at TAD boundaries more than expected by chance. Some breakpoints may alter gene expression within TADs supporting the hypothesis that position effects contribute to inversion establishment. This article is part of the theme issue 'Genomic architecture of supergenes: causes and evolutionary consequences'.

Citing Articles

Chromosomal inversions and their impact on insect evolution.

Sharakhov I, Sharakhova M Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2024; 66:101280.

PMID: 39374869 PMC: 11611660. DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2024.101280.


Genomics of natural populations: gene conversion events reveal selected genes within the inversions of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Schaeffer S, Richards S, Fuller Z G3 (Bethesda). 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39073776 PMC: 11457094. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae176.


Chromosomal Inversions and the Demography of Speciation in Drosophila montana and Drosophila flavomontana.

Poikela N, Laetsch D, Hoikkala V, Lohse K, Kankare M Genome Biol Evol. 2024; 16(3).

PMID: 38482698 PMC: 10972691. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evae024.


Nuclear genome organization in fungi: from gene folding to Rabl chromosomes.

Torres D, Reckard A, Klocko A, Seidl M FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2023; 47(3).

PMID: 37197899 PMC: 10246852. DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuad021.


Genomic architecture of supergenes: connecting form and function.

Berdan E, Flatt T, Kozak G, Lotterhos K, Wielstra B Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022; 377(1856):20210192.

PMID: 35694757 PMC: 9189501. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0192.


References
1.
Lettice L, Daniels S, Sweeney E, Venkataraman S, Devenney P, Gautier P . Enhancer-adoption as a mechanism of human developmental disease. Hum Mutat. 2011; 32(12):1492-9. DOI: 10.1002/humu.21615. View

2.
Dobzhansky T . Genetics of natural populations. XIX. Origin of heterosis through natural selection in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1950; 35(3):288-302. PMC: 1209487. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/35.3.288. View

3.
Richards S, Liu Y, Bettencourt B, Hradecky P, Letovsky S, Nielsen R . Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura: chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution. Genome Res. 2005; 15(1):1-18. PMC: 540289. DOI: 10.1101/gr.3059305. View

4.
Wright D, Schaeffer S . The relevance of chromatin architecture to genome rearrangements in . Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022; 377(1856):20210206. PMC: 9189500. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0206. View

5.
Cubenas-Potts C, Corces V . Architectural proteins, transcription, and the three-dimensional organization of the genome. FEBS Lett. 2015; 589(20 Pt A):2923-30. PMC: 4598269. DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.05.025. View