» Articles » PMID: 39583217

Response of Fruit Fly () to Diet Manipulation of Nutrient Density

Overview
Journal Physiol Entomol
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Nov 25
PMID 39583217
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Caloric intake can greatly affect many aspects of an organism's life. A deficiency of calories can lead to stress resulting in decreased fecundity, insufficient calories to maintain tissues and increased lifespan. Conversely, increasing caloric density increases fecundity and decreases lifespan. Despite decades of work exploring food quality and quantity on physiology in the model species Meigan 1830 (Diptera: Drosophilidae) and the melanogaster group in general, relatively little work explores the physiological responses to diet manipulation in other species, like the obscura species group. Here, we looked at the effects of five different caloric densities (0.5×, 0.75×, 1.0×, 1.5× and 3.0×) on food intake, body weight, body fat, fecundity and longevity in Frolova & Astaurov, 1929 (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Comparing longevity and fecundity across diets, we found that heavy caloric concentration (3.0×) decreases lifespan and that calorie restriction (0.5× and 0.75×) led to significant decreases in fecundity and body weight. However, calorie concentration did not significantly increase body fat. By expanding our understanding of the physiological responses to diet stress to , we establish the framework for comparative work across species. With this information, we can then identify which physiological responses to diet manipulation might be most conserved and comparable across species.

References
1.
Roark A, Bjorndal K . Metabolic rate depression is induced by caloric restriction and correlates with rate of development and lifespan in a parthenogenetic insect. Exp Gerontol. 2009; 44(6-7):413-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2009.03.004. View

2.
Lachaise D, Silvain J . How two Afrotropical endemics made two cosmopolitan human commensals: the Drosophila melanogaster-D. simulans palaeogeographic riddle. Genetica. 2004; 120(1-3):17-39. DOI: 10.1023/b:gene.0000017627.27537.ef. View

3.
Min K, Flatt T, Kulaots I, Tatar M . Counting calories in Drosophila diet restriction. Exp Gerontol. 2006; 42(3):247-51. PMC: 2606145. DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2006.10.009. View

4.
Chapman T, Partridge L . Female fitness in Drosophila melanogaster: an interaction between the effect of nutrition and of encounter rate with males. Proc Biol Sci. 1996; 263(1371):755-9. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0113. View

5.
Bochdanovits Z, de Jong G . Experimental evolution in Drosophila melanogaster: interaction of temperature and food quality selection regimes. Evolution. 2003; 57(8):1829-36. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00590.x. View