Development of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Resistance to 4'-Ethynyl-2-Fluoro-2'-Deoxyadenosine Starting with Wild-Type or Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor-Resistant Strains
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
4'-Ethynyl-2-fluoro-2'-deoxyadenosine (EFdA, MK-8591, islatravir) is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor (NRTTI) with exceptional potency against wild-type (WT) and drug-resistant HIV-1 in phase III clinical trials. EFdA resistance is not well characterized. To study EFdA resistance patterns that may emerge in naive or tenofovir (TFV)-, emtricitabine/lamivudine (FTC/3TC)-, or zidovudine (AZT)-treated patients, we performed viral passaging experiments starting with WT, K65R, M184V, or D67N/K70R/T215F/K219Q HIV-1. Regardless of the starting viral sequence, all selected EFdA-resistant variants included the M184V reverse transcriptase (RT) mutation. Using recombinant viruses, we validated the role for M184V as the primary determinant of EFdA resistance; none of the observed connection subdomain (R358K and E399K) or RNase H domain (A502V) mutations significantly contributed to EFdA resistance. A novel EFdA resistance mutational pattern that included A114S was identified in the background of M184V. A114S/M184V exhibited higher EFdA resistance (∼24-fold) than either M184V (∼8-fold) or A114S alone (∼2-fold). Remarkably, A114S/M184V and A114S/M184V/A502V resistance mutations were up to 50-fold more sensitive to tenofovir than was WT HIV-1. These mutants also had significantly lower specific infectivities than did WT. Biochemical experiments confirmed decreases in the enzymatic efficiency (/) of WT versus A114S (2.1-fold) and A114S/M184V/A502V (6.5-fold) RTs, with no effect of A502V on enzymatic efficiency or specific infectivity. The rather modest EFdA resistance of M184V or A114S/M184V (8- and 24-fold), their hypersusceptibility to tenofovir, and strong published and data suggest that EFdA is an excellent therapeutic candidate for naive, AZT-, FTC/3TC-, and especially tenofovir-treated patients.
Nka A, Bouba Y, Tsapi Lontsi W, Gouissi Anguechia D, Teto G, Kae A Viruses. 2025; 17(1).
PMID: 39861858 PMC: 11768859. DOI: 10.3390/v17010069.
Byun H, Papathanasopoulos M, Steegen K, Basson A Viruses. 2025; 16(12.
PMID: 39772195 PMC: 11680407. DOI: 10.3390/v16121888.
Comprehensive database of HIV mutations selected during antiretroviral in vitro passage experiments.
Tao K, Zhou J, Nagarajan P, Tzou P, Shafer R Antiviral Res. 2024; 230:105988.
PMID: 39154752 PMC: 11412686. DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2024.105988.
Diamond T, Goh S, Ngo W, Rodriguez S, Xu M, Klein D Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024; 68(7):e0033424.
PMID: 38864613 PMC: 11232396. DOI: 10.1128/aac.00334-24.
Epistatic pathways can drive HIV-1 escape from integrase strand transfer inhibitors.
Hikichi Y, Grover J, Schafer A, Mothes W, Freed E Sci Adv. 2024; 10(9):eadn0042.
PMID: 38427738 PMC: 10906922. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adn0042.