» Articles » PMID: 23828227

Clinical Evaluation of Automatic Tube Voltage Selection in Chest CT Angiography

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2013 Jul 6
PMID 23828227
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical impact of automatic tube voltage selection on chest CT angiography (CTA).

Methods: Ninety-three patients were prospectively evaluated with a CT protocol aimed at comparing two successive CTAs acquired under similar technical conditions except for the kV selection: (1) the initial CTA was systematically obtained at 120 kVp and 90 ref mAs; (2) the follow-up CTA was obtained with an automatic selection of the kilovoltage (Care KV; Siemens Healthcare) for optimised CTA.

Results: At follow-up, 90 patients (97 %) underwent CTA with reduced tube voltage, 100 kV (n = 26; 28 %) and 80 kV (n = 64; 69 %), resulting in a significant dose-length-product reduction (follow-up: 87.27; initial: 141.88 mGy.cm; P < 0.0001; mean dose reduction: 38.5 %) and a significant increase in the CNR at follow-up (follow-up: 11.5 ± 3.5 HU; initial: 10.9 ± 3.7 HU; P = 0.03). The increase in objective image noise at follow-up (follow-up: 23.2 ± 6.7 HU vs. 17.8 ± 5.1 HU; P < 0.0001) did not alter the diagnostic value of images.

Conclusion: Automatic tube voltage selection reduced the radiation dose delivered during chest CT angiograms by 38.5 % while improving the contrast-to-noise ratio of the examinations.

Key Points: • As low a dose as possible must be used for CT angiography. • Automatic tube voltage selection permits reduced patient exposure. • Lowering the kVp enables increased intravascular attenuation. • Automatic tube voltage selection does not compromise the overall image quality.

Citing Articles

Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: when photon-counting-detector CT replaces energy-integrating-detector CT in daily routine.

Remy-Jardin M, Oufriche I, Guiffault L, Duhamel A, Flohr T, Schmidt B Eur Radiol. 2024; 34(10):6544-6555.

PMID: 38634875 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10724-5.


CT acquisition parameter selection in the real world: impacts on radiation dose and variation amongst 155 institutions.

Wang Y, Chu P, Szczykutowicz T, Stewart C, Smith-Bindman R Eur Radiol. 2023; 34(3):1605-1613.

PMID: 37646805 PMC: 10873435. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10161-w.


Application of low-dose CT to the creation of 3D-printed kidney and perinephric tissue models for laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Li G, Dong J, Cao Z, Wang J, Cao D, Zhang X Cancer Med. 2021; 10(9):3077-3084.

PMID: 33797861 PMC: 8085913. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3851.


Validation of CARE kV automated tube voltage selection for PET-CT: PET quantification and CT radiation dose reduction in phantoms.

Bebbington N, Jorgensen T, Dupont E, Micheelsen M EJNMMI Phys. 2021; 8(1):29.

PMID: 33743091 PMC: 7981373. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-021-00373-8.


Application of low-concentration contrast agents and low-tube-voltage computed tomography to chest enhancement examinations: A multicenter prospective study.

Meng D, Cui X, Bai C, Yu Z, Xin L, Fu Y Sci Prog. 2019; 103(1):36850419892193.

PMID: 31791209 PMC: 10358470. DOI: 10.1177/0036850419892193.


References
1.
Kalender W, Deak P, Kellermeier M, van Straten M, Vollmar S . Application- and patient size-dependent optimization of x-ray spectra for CT. Med Phys. 2009; 36(3):993-1007. DOI: 10.1118/1.3075901. View

2.
Szucs-Farkas Z, Kurmann L, Strautz T, Patak M, Vock P, Schindera S . Patient exposure and image quality of low-dose pulmonary computed tomography angiography: comparison of 100- and 80-kVp protocols. Invest Radiol. 2008; 43(12):871-6. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181875e86. View

3.
Schueller-Weidekamm C, Schaefer-Prokop C, Weber M, Herold C, Prokop M . CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: improvement of vascular enhancement with low kilovoltage settings. Radiology. 2006; 241(3):899-907. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2413040128. View

4.
Pontana F, Duhamel A, Pagniez J, Flohr T, Faivre J, Hachulla A . Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol. 2010; 21(3):636-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1991-4. View

5.
Gnannt R, Winklehner A, Eberli D, Knuth A, Frauenfelder T, Alkadhi H . Automated tube potential selection for standard chest and abdominal CT in follow-up patients with testicular cancer: comparison with fixed tube potential. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22(9):1937-45. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2453-y. View