Automated Tube Potential Selection for Standard Chest and Abdominal CT in Follow-up Patients with Testicular Cancer: Comparison with Fixed Tube Potential

Overview

Journal Eur Radiol

Specialty Radiology

Date 2012 May 3

PMID 22549104

Citations 10

Authors

Ralph Gnannt

Anna Winklehner

Daniel Eberli

Alexander Knuth

Thomas Frauenfelder

Hatem Alkadhi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate prospectively, in patients with testicular cancer, the radiation dose-saving potential and image quality of contrast-enhanced chest and abdominal CT with automated tube potential selection.

Methods: Forty consecutive patients with testicular cancer underwent contrast-enhanced arterio-venous chest and portal-venous abdominal CT with automated tube potential selection (protocol B; tube potential 80-140 kVp), which is based on the attenuation of the CT topogram. All had a first CT at 120 kVp (protocol A) using the same 64-section CT machine and similar settings. Image quality was assessed; dose information (CTDI(vol)) was noted.

Results: Image noise and attenuation in the liver and spleen were significantly higher for protocol B (P < 0.05 each), whereas attenuation in the deltoid and erector spinae muscles was similar. In protocol B, tube potential was reduced to 100 kVp in 18 chest and 33 abdominal examinations, and to 80 kVp in 5 abdominal CT examinations; it increased to 140 kVp in one patient. Image quality of examinations using both CT protocols was rated as diagnostic. CTDI(vol) was significantly lower for protocol B compared to protocol A (reduction by 12%, P < 0.01).

Conclusion: In patients with testicular cancer, radiation dose of chest and abdominal CT can be reduced with automated tube potential selection, while image quality is preserved.

Citing Articles

Use of diagnostic vs low-dose computed tomography in positron emission tomography-CT examinations.

Malekhedayat M, Stewart C, Chu P, Wang Y, Kasraie N, Franc B Eur Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 40055228 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11391-w.

Estimation and comparison of the effective dose and lifetime attributable risk of thyroid cancer between males and females in routine head computed tomography scans: a multicentre study.

Khoramian D, Haghparast M, Honardari A, Nouri E, Ranjbar E, Abedi-Friouzjah R J Med Radiat Sci. 2024; 71(2):240-250.

PMID: 38216155 PMC: 11177018. DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.752.

Can fully iterative reconstruction technique enable routine abdominal CT at less than 1 mSv?.

Tabari A, Ramandeep S, Doda Khera R, Hoi Y, Angel E, Kalra M Eur J Radiol Open. 2019; 6:225-230.

PMID: 31304196 PMC: 6603257. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2019.05.001.

Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT.

Park C, Gruber-Rouh T, Leithner D, Zierden A, Albrecht M, Wichmann J Cancer Imaging. 2016; 16(1):33.

PMID: 27724954 PMC: 5057380. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-016-0093-1.

Feasibility of low-dose CT with model-based iterative image reconstruction in follow-up of patients with testicular cancer.

Murphy K, Crush L, ONeill S, Foody J, Breen M, Brady A Eur J Radiol Open. 2016; 3:38-45.

PMID: 27069978 PMC: 4811850. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2016.01.002.

References

Brenner D, Doll R, Goodhead D, Hall E, Land C, Little J . Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(24):13761-6. PMC: 283495. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2235592100. View

Shrimpton P, Hillier M, Lewis M, Dunn M . National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol. 2007; 79(948):968-80. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/93277434. View

Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid F, Scheffel H, Stinn B, Marincek B . Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(9):1809-17. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-0966-1. View

Amis Jr E, Butler P . ACR white paper on radiation dose in medicine: three years later. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010; 7(11):865-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.04.006. View

Winklehner A, Karlo C, Puippe G, Schmidt B, Flohr T, Goetti R . Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21(12):2521-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2227-y. View

Albers P, Albrecht W, Algaba F, Bokemeyer C, Cohn-Cedermark G, Horwich A . Guidelines on testicular cancer. Eur Urol. 2005; 48(6):885-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.06.019. View

Gnannt R, Winklehner A, Goetti R, Schmidt B, Kollias S, Alkadhi H . Low kilovoltage CT of the neck with 70 kVp: comparison with a standard protocol. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33(6):1014-9. PMC: 8013269. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2910. View

Sodickson A, Baeyens P, Andriole K, Prevedello L, Nawfel R, Hanson R . Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology. 2009; 251(1):175-84. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2511081296. View

Huda W, Scalzetti E, Levin G . Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. Radiology. 2000; 217(2):430-5. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv35430. View

10.

Wintersperger B, Jakobs T, Herzog P, Schaller S, Nikolaou K, Suess C . Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2004; 15(2):334-41. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2575-y. View

11.

Yu L, Li H, Fletcher J, McCollough C . Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: a general strategy. Med Phys. 2010; 37(1):234-43. DOI: 10.1118/1.3264614. View

12.

Mitsumori L, Shuman W, Busey J, Kolokythas O, Koprowicz K . Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection in the same patient: 64 channel liver CT image quality and patient radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2011; 22(1):138-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2186-3. View

13.

Hansen J, Jurik A . Diagnostic value of multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of retroperitoneal spread of testicular cancer: a literature review. Acta Radiol. 2009; 50(9):1064-70. DOI: 10.3109/02841850903220371. View

14.

Pontana F, Pagniez J, Flohr T, Faivre J, Duhamel A, Remy J . Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 1): Evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol. 2010; 21(3):627-35. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1990-5. View

15.

Kalra M, Maher M, Toth T, Schmidt B, Westerman B, Morgan H . Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology. 2004; 233(3):649-57. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2333031150. View

16.

Winklehner A, Goetti R, Baumueller S, Karlo C, Schmidt B, Raupach R . Automated attenuation-based tube potential selection for thoracoabdominal computed tomography angiography: improved dose effectiveness. Invest Radiol. 2011; 46(12):767-73. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182266448. View

17.

Marin D, Nelson R, Barnhart H, Schindera S, Ho L, Jaffe T . Detection of pancreatic tumors, image quality, and radiation dose during the pancreatic parenchymal phase: effect of a low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current CT technique--preliminary results. Radiology. 2010; 256(2):450-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091819. View

18.

May M, Wust W, Brand M, Stahl C, Allmendinger T, Schmidt B . Dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography: intraindividual comparison of image quality of full-dose standard and half-dose iterative reconstructions with dual-source computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2011; 46(7):465-70. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31821690a1. View

19.

Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y, Liu D, Nakaura T, Tamura Y . Lower tube voltage reduces contrast material and radiation doses on 16-MDCT aortography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187(5):W490-7. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.0471. View

20.

Marin D, Nelson R, Samei E, Paulson E, Ho L, Boll D . Hypervascular liver tumors: low tube voltage, high tube current multidetector CT during late hepatic arterial phase for detection--initial clinical experience. Radiology. 2009; 251(3):771-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2513081330. View