Exiting Root Injury in Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy: Preoperative Image Considerations for Safety

Overview

Journal Eur Spine J

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2013 Jun 12

PMID 23754603

Citations 51

Authors

Il Choi

Jae-Ouk Ahn

Wan-Soo So

Seung-Joon Lee

In-Jae Choi

Hoon Kim

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and radiological risk factors for exiting root injuries during transforaminal endoscopic discectomy.

Methods: We retrospectively examined cohort data from 233 patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2011. We divided the patients into the two groups: those who presented a postoperative exiting root injury, such as postoperative dysesthesia or motor weakness (Group A, n = 20), and those who did not suffer from a root injury (Group B, n = 213). We examined the clinical and radiological factors relating exiting root injuries. We measured the active working zone with the exiting root to the upper facet distance (Distance A), the exiting root to disc surface distance at the lower facet line (Distance B) and the exiting root to the lower facet distance (Distance C) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Results: Group A exhibited a shorter Distance C (6.4 ± 1.5 versus 4.4 ± 0.8 mm, p < 0.001) and a longer operation time (67.9 ± 21.8 versus 80.3 ± 23.7 min, p = 0.017) relative to Group B. The complication rate decreased by 23% per each 1-mm increase in Distance C (p = 0.000). In addition, the complication rate increased 1.027-fold per each 1-min increase in the operation time (p = 0.027).

Conclusion: We recommend measuring the distance from the exiting root to the facet at the lower disc level according to a preoperative MRI scan. If the distance is narrow, an alternative surgical method, such as microdiscectomy or conventional open discectomy, should be considered.

Citing Articles

Artificial intelligence-driven 3D MRI of lumbosacral nerve root anomalies: accuracy, incidence, and clinical utility.

Ukeba D, Nagahama K, Yamada K, Abe Y, Hyugaji Y, Endo T Neuroradiology. 2025; .

PMID: 40021500 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-025-03574-5.

Evolving Paradigms in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Learning Curves in Minimally Invasive Spine Techniques.

Wu K, Yun Z, Suvithayasiri S, Liang Y, Setiawan D, Kotheeranurak V Neurospine. 2025; 21(4):1251-1275.

PMID: 39765270 PMC: 11744536. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448838.419.

Reducing Postoperative Neurological Complications in Uniportal Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Efficacy of the GUARD Technique Combined With Delayed Ligamentum Flavectomy.

Chuang H, Hsu Y, Liu Y, Chang C, Hsiao Y, Huang Y Neurospine. 2025; 21(4):1199-1209.

PMID: 39765265 PMC: 11744540. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448656.328.

Anatomical assessment of the Kambin's triangle for percutaneous posterolateral transforaminal endoscopic surgery of lumbar intervertebral discs: a magnetic resonance imaging based study.

Nikpour N, Fazelinejad Z, Sametzadeh M, Lordjani M, Eftekhari Moghadam A Anat Cell Biol. 2024; 57(4):523-534.

PMID: 39511780 PMC: 11663528. DOI: 10.5115/acb.24.112.

Access Pain During Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Foraminal or Extraforaminal Disc Herniation.

Ahn Y, Choi J, Lee S Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(20).

PMID: 39451660 PMC: 11508188. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14202337.

References

Weber B, Grob D, Dvorak J, Muntener M . Posterior surgical approach to the lumbar spine and its effect on the multifidus muscle. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22(15):1765-72. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199708010-00017. View

Weinstein J, Lurie J, Tosteson T, Skinner J, Hanscom B, Tosteson A . Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA. 2006; 296(20):2451-9. PMC: 2562254. DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.20.2451. View

Jacobs W, Arts M, Van Tulder M, Rubinstein S, van Middelkoop M, Ostelo R . Surgical techniques for sciatica due to herniated disc, a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2012; 21(11):2232-51. PMC: 3481105. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2422-9. View

Tsou P, Yeung A . Transforaminal endoscopic decompression for radiculopathy secondary to intracanal noncontained lumbar disc herniations: outcome and technique. Spine J. 2003; 2(1):41-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1529-9430(01)00153-x. View

Ruetten S, Komp M, Godolias G . A New full-endoscopic technique for the interlaminar operation of lumbar disc herniations using 6-mm endoscopes: prospective 2-year results of 331 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2006; 49(2):80-7. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-932172. View

Mirkovic S, SCHWARTZ D, Glazier K . Anatomic considerations in lumbar posterolateral percutaneous procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20(18):1965-71. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199509150-00001. View

Knight M, ELLISON D, Goswami A, Hillier V . Review of safety in endoscopic laser foraminoplasty for the management of back pain. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2001; 19(3):147-57. DOI: 10.1089/10445470152927982. View

Kambin P, OBrien E, Zhou L, Schaffer J . Arthroscopic microdiscectomy and selective fragmentectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; (347):150-67. View

Weinstein J, Lurie J, Tosteson T, Tosteson A, Blood E, Abdu W . Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(25):2789-800. PMC: 2756172. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ed8f4. View

10.

Pedowitz R, Garfin S, Massie J, Hargens A, Swenson M, Myers R . Effects of magnitude and duration of compression on spinal nerve root conduction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992; 17(2):194-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199202000-00013. View

11.

Cho J, Lee S, Lee H . Prevention of development of postoperative dysesthesia in transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for intracanalicular lumbar disc herniation: floating retraction technique. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2012; 54(5-6):214-8. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1287774. View

12.

Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G . Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(9):931-9. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8af7. View

13.

Mayer H, Brock M . Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Neurosurg Rev. 1993; 16(2):115-20. DOI: 10.1007/BF00258242. View

14.

Ahn Y, Lee S, Park W, Lee H, Shin S, Kang H . Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and prognostic factors of 43 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(16):E326-32. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000134591.32462.98. View

15.

Ruetten S, Komp M, Godolias G . An extreme lateral access for the surgery of lumbar disc herniations inside the spinal canal using the full-endoscopic uniportal transforaminal approach-technique and prospective results of 463 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(22):2570-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000186327.21435.cc. View

16.

Kambin P . Arthroscopic microdiskectomy. Mt Sinai J Med. 1991; 58(2):159-64. View

17.

Hermantin F, Peters T, Quartararo L, Kambin P . A prospective, randomized study comparing the results of open discectomy with those of video-assisted arthroscopic microdiscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81(7):958-65. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199907000-00008. View

18.

Ahn Y, Lee S, Park W, Lee H . Posterolateral percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy for L5-S1 foraminal or lateral exit zone stenosis. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2003; 99(3 Suppl):320-3. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2003.99.3.0320. View

19.

Lee S, Kang B, Ahn Y, Choi G, Choi Y, Ahn K . Operative failure of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a radiologic analysis of 55 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(10):E285-90. DOI: 10.1097/01. brs.0000216446.13205.7a. View

20.

Peul W, van Houwelingen H, van den Hout W, Brand R, Eekhof J, Tans J . Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(22):2245-56. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa064039. View