Determination of the Entry Point for Lower Lumbar Intradiscal Procedure Using Transforaminal Technique: Cross-Sectional Study Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Overview

Journal Spine Surg Relat Res

Date 2022 Dec 23

PMID 36561161

Authors

Mohd Imran Yusof

Azizul Akram Salim

Joehaimey Johari

Allan Ravi Rajagopal

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Triangular working area otherwise known as the Kambin triangle is designated as a safe place to position the instrument during the operation, with minimal risk to exiting nerves. This study aims to improve understanding and increase the safety of various transforaminal intradiscal procedures at L3/L4, L4/L5, and L5/S1 levels.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis involving 102 MRIs that met the inclusion criteria was obtained and analyzed at the L3/L4, L4/L5, and L5/S1 discs level. For each level, the Kambin triangle was measured. By evaluating those measurements, the viability of this method was determined.

Results: Safe working zone approach angles were consistently getting wider from L3 to S1 levels. It was statistically significant to be wider for the left side for the mean angle of lateral nucleus trajectory at the L4/L5 level and L5/S1. The entry point is at 32, 45, and 55-60 mm from the midline, and the instrument should be directed at 12°, 20°, and 27° medially for the lateral nucleus at L3/L4, L4/L5, and L5/S1, respectively. The center of the nucleus pulposus entry point is at 64, 77, and 85 mm from the midline with a medial inclination of 40°, 47°, and 52°, respectively, for L3/L4, L4/L5, and L5/S1. For the posterior nucleus pulposus, the skin should be pierced 90, 140, and 180 mm from the midline and directed medially at 53°, 61°, and 68°, respectively, for L3/L4, L4/L5, and L5/S1. The posterior annulus fibrosis entry point is 172, 355, and 450 mm with a medial inclination of 69°, 80°, and 84° at L3/L4, L4/L5, and L5/S1, respectively. The sagittal inclination is 3° cephalad at L3/L4, 10° caudally at L4/L5, and 27° caudally at L5/S1.

Conclusions: Preoperative MRI assessment is important to determine the angle of trajectory for the safe entry point for intradiscal procedure via transforaminal approach.

References

Weber B, Grob D, Dvorak J, Muntener M . Posterior surgical approach to the lumbar spine and its effect on the multifidus muscle. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22(15):1765-72. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199708010-00017. View

Civelek E, Solmaz I, Cansever T, Onal B, Kabatas S, Bolukbasi N . Radiological Analysis of the Triangular Working Zone during Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy. Asian Spine J. 2012; 6(2):98-104. PMC: 3372555. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2012.6.2.98. View

Mirkovic S, SCHWARTZ D, Glazier K . Anatomic considerations in lumbar posterolateral percutaneous procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20(18):1965-71. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199509150-00001. View

Yeung A, Yeung C . Advances in endoscopic disc and spine surgery: foraminal approach. Surg Technol Int. 2003; 11:255-63. View

Min J, Kang S, Lee J, Cho T, Suh J, Rhyu I . Morphometric analysis of the working zone for endoscopic lumbar discectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005; 18(2):132-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000159034.97246.4f. View

Telfeian A, Veeravagu A, Oyelese A, Ziya L Gokaslan . A brief history of endoscopic spine surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2016; 40(2):E2. DOI: 10.3171/2015.11.FOCUS15429. View

Ahn Y, Lee S, Park W, Lee H, Shin S, Kang H . Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and prognostic factors of 43 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(16):E326-32. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000134591.32462.98. View

Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Woolf A, Blyth F, Vos T . Measuring the global burden of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 24(2):155-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.11.002. View

Guan X, Gu X, Zhang L, Wu X, Zhang H, He S . Morphometric analysis of the working zone for posterolateral endoscopic lumbar discectomy based on magnetic resonance neurography. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014; 28(2):E78-84. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000145. View

10.

Rantanen J, Hurme M, Falck B, Alaranta H, Nykvist F, Lehto M . The lumbar multifidus muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993; 18(5):568-74. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199304000-00008. View

11.

Lee D, Kim N, Park J, Hwang C, Lee C, Kim Y . CT scan assessment of the pathway of the true lateral approach for transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy: is It possible?. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93(10):1395-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B10.26833. View

12.

Choi I, Ahn J, So W, Lee S, Choi I, Kim H . Exiting root injury in transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: preoperative image considerations for safety. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22(11):2481-7. PMC: 3886527. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2849-7. View

13.

Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G . Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(9):931-9. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8af7. View

14.

Staal J, Hlobil H, van Tulder M, Waddell G, Burton A, Koes B . Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain: an international comparison. Occup Environ Med. 2003; 60(9):618-26. PMC: 1740612. DOI: 10.1136/oem.60.9.618. View

15.

Sanjeevan R, Prabu S, Azizul A, Abdul-Halim Y . Discal Cyst of the Lumbar Spine: Case Report of a Rare Clinical Entity. Malays Orthop J. 2018; 12(2):56-58. PMC: 6092529. DOI: 10.5704/MOJ.1807.011. View