» Articles » PMID: 39451660

Access Pain During Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Foraminal or Extraforaminal Disc Herniation

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Oct 25
PMID 39451660
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/objectives: Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) under local anesthesia is a promising minimally invasive surgical option for intractable lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, our understanding of access pain prediction during foraminal pathological procedures is limited. To our knowledge, no predictive rules for access pain have been established during TELD for foraminal or extraforaminal LDH. This study, with its potential for predicting access pain during TELD and discussing strategies for pain prevention and management, could significantly benefit the field of endoscopic spine surgery.

Methods: This observational study included 73 consecutive patients who underwent TELD for foraminal or extraforaminal LDH between January 2017 and December 2022. Preoperative clinical and radiographic factors affecting significant access pain and the impact of access pain on clinical outcomes were evaluated.

Results: The rate of significant access pain was 13.70% (10 of 73 patients). Extraforaminal LDH tended to cause more severe pain than did foraminal LDH during TELD under local anesthesia ( < 0.05). Although the degree of access pain was not related to global clinical outcomes, increased pain was strongly associated with prolonged operative time and length of hospital stay ( < 0.05).

Conclusions: TELD could be an effective surgical option for foraminal or extraforaminal LDH under local anesthesia. More access pain might develop during TELD for extraforaminal LDH. The extraforaminal component of LDH could narrow the safe working zone. Significant access pain might prolong the duration of surgery and hospitalization. Thus, a specialized technique is required for the clinical success of TELD.

References
1.
Nellensteijn J, Ostelo R, Bartels R, Peul W, van Royen B, van Tulder M . Transforaminal endoscopic surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2009; 19(2):181-204. PMC: 2899820. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1155-x. View

2.
Li W, Yan Q, Cong L . Comparison of Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Non-Endoscopic Discectomy for Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Global Spine J. 2021; 12(5):1012-1026. PMC: 9344526. DOI: 10.1177/21925682211020696. View

3.
Hijikata S . Percutaneous nucleotomy. A new concept technique and 12 years' experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; (238):9-23. View

4.
Birkenmaier C, Komp M, Leu H, Wegener B, Ruetten S . The current state of endoscopic disc surgery: review of controlled studies comparing full-endoscopic procedures for disc herniations to standard procedures. Pain Physician. 2013; 16(4):335-44. View

5.
Hofstetter C, Ahn Y, Choi G, Gibson J, Ruetten S, Zhou Y . AOSpine Consensus Paper on Nomenclature for Working-Channel Endoscopic Spinal Procedures. Global Spine J. 2020; 10(2 Suppl):111S-121S. PMC: 7263337. DOI: 10.1177/2192568219887364. View