» Articles » PMID: 8578369

Anatomic Considerations in Lumbar Posterolateral Percutaneous Procedures

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1995 Sep 15
PMID 8578369
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Intervertebral foraminal anatomy of L2-S1 was investigated by the anatomic dissection of 96 foraminal levels in 12 human cadaveric spines.

Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine the dimensions of the "safe zone" and a safe point of insertion in percutaneous intradiscal procedures and the largest safe working cannula diameter.

Summary Of Background Data: Working cannulas are used in percutaneous lumbar procedures. The dimensions of the safe zone of insertion and determination of the optimal cannula size based on these measurements and point of insertion are unclear from the literature.

Methods: Safe zone dimensions from L2-L3 to L5-S1 were determined as were two cannula diameters, C1 and C2. C1 was the maximal cannula size that can be placed within the safe zone. C2 is the maximal size allowable when the point of insertion lies in the midline of the pedicle.

Results: The average triangular safe zone was 18.9 mm wide and 12.3 mm high; the hypotenuse measured 23.0 mm. The maximum C1 diameter ranged 5.0-10.0 mm. The corresponding safe point of insertion lay along the medial one third of the pedicle. The maximum C2 diameter ranged 4.0-8.9 mm. The corresponding safe point of insertion lay in the midline of the pedicle.

Conclusions: Either a 7.5-mm cannula placed in line with the medial one third of the pedicle or a 6.3-mm cannula located in the midline of the pedicle appears safe.

Citing Articles

Dimensions of bony Kambin's triangle pertaining to endoscopic procedure.

Sinha M, Rachel John M, Abraham Poonuraparampil J, Prasad Sinha H Med J Armed Forces India. 2024; 80(Suppl 1):S127-S134.

PMID: 39734887 PMC: 11670639. DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2022.12.018.


Anatomical assessment of the Kambin's triangle for percutaneous posterolateral transforaminal endoscopic surgery of lumbar intervertebral discs: a magnetic resonance imaging based study.

Nikpour N, Fazelinejad Z, Sametzadeh M, Lordjani M, Eftekhari Moghadam A Anat Cell Biol. 2024; 57(4):523-534.

PMID: 39511780 PMC: 11663528. DOI: 10.5115/acb.24.112.


Evolution, Current Trends, and Latest Advances of Endoscopic Spine Surgery.

Gunjotikar S, Pestonji M, Tanaka M, Komatsubara T, Ekade S, Heydar A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38892919 PMC: 11172902. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113208.


Lumbar safety triangle: comparative study of coronal and coronal oblique planes in 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging.

Dannebrock F, Zardo E, Ziegler M, Vialle E, Soder R, Schwanke C Radiol Bras. 2024; 56(6):327-335.

PMID: 38504808 PMC: 10948153. DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0022.


Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy using a 45° puncture angle and foraminotomy versus traditional THESYS for L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Qian Y, Chen Z, Zhang G, Wang X, Liu J, Yang A Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(2):453-462.

PMID: 38252307 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08117-1.