» Articles » PMID: 16708336

A New Full-endoscopic Technique for the Interlaminar Operation of Lumbar Disc Herniations Using 6-mm Endoscopes: Prospective 2-year Results of 331 Patients

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2006 May 19
PMID 16708336
Citations 104
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Even with good results, conventional disc operations may result in consecutive damage due to traumatisation. Endoscopic techniques have become the standard in many areas because of the advantages they offer in surgical technique and in rehabilitation. The transforaminal operation is the most common full-endoscopic procedure in surgery of the lumbar spine. It is frequently necessary to reach the spinal canal directly in order to achieve sufficient resection of lumbar disc herniations. Even in using a lateral approach, the authors recognise the clear limitations of the transforaminal procedure. The objective of this prospective study was to examine the technical possibility of a full-endoscopic interlaminar access. The focus was on questions of sufficient decompression, as well as advantages and disadvantages of the minimally invasive procedure. 331 patients were followed for 2 years. The results show that 82 % reported no longer having leg pain, and 13 % had only occasional pain. The decompression results are equivalent to those of conventional procedures. Traumatisation of both the access pathway and the spinal canal structures was reduced. Epidural scarring was minimised. The recurrence rate was 2.4 %. No serious surgical complications were observed. The authors view the technique described, which offers the advantage of a truly minimally invasive procedure, as a sufficient and safe alternative to conventional procedures, when the appropriate indication criteria are heeded. There are technical problems because of the small instruments. In conjunction with the transforaminal procedure, this is an expansion of the spectrum for full-endoscopic surgery of lumbar disc herniations.

Citing Articles

Clinical comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for L4/5 and L5/S1 dual-level disc herniation.

Zhang H, Gao J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7323.

PMID: 40025203 PMC: 11873299. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-92128-z.


Comparison of clinical outcomes and cost-utility between unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective matched controlled study.

Yang Y, Yu J, Zhu Z, Li Y, Xiao Z, Zhi C J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):755.

PMID: 39543612 PMC: 11562584. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05231-8.


Early Endoscopic Discectomy in Preventing Degenerative Spinal Changes in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Toropchyn V, Sarna R, Gray C, Kumar S Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69725.

PMID: 39429277 PMC: 11490265. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69725.


Is Close Supervision by a Senior Surgeon Necessary During the Initial Days of Performing Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy? A Retrospective Comparative Study between Two Fellowship Trained Surgeons to Assess the Learning Curve.

Ifthekar S, Lee S, Lee S, Shin S, Bae J J West Afr Coll Surg. 2024; 14(4):403-407.

PMID: 39309388 PMC: 11412599. DOI: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_170_23.


Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy with patients' participation : better postoperative rehabilitation and satisfaction.

Liu W, Liu L, Pan Z, Gu E J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):547.

PMID: 39237977 PMC: 11378537. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05043-w.