» Articles » PMID: 17538084

Surgery Versus Prolonged Conservative Treatment for Sciatica

Overview
Journal N Engl J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2007 Jun 1
PMID 17538084
Citations 232
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Lumbar-disk surgery often is performed in patients who have sciatica that does not resolve within 6 weeks, but the optimal timing of surgery is not known.

Methods: We randomly assigned 283 patients who had had severe sciatica for 6 to 12 weeks to early surgery or to prolonged conservative treatment with surgery if needed. The primary outcomes were the score on the Roland Disability Questionnaire, the score on the visual-analogue scale for leg pain, and the patient's report of perceived recovery during the first year after randomization. Repeated-measures analysis according to the intention-to-treat principle was used to estimate the outcome curves for both groups.

Results: Of 141 patients assigned to undergo early surgery, 125 (89%) underwent microdiskectomy after a mean of 2.2 weeks. Of 142 patients designated for conservative treatment, 55 (39%) were treated surgically after a mean of 18.7 weeks. There was no significant overall difference in disability scores during the first year (P=0.13). Relief of leg pain was faster for patients assigned to early surgery (P<0.001). Patients assigned to early surgery also reported a faster rate of perceived recovery (hazard ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.72 to 2.22; P<0.001). In both groups, however, the probability of perceived recovery after 1 year of follow-up was 95%.

Conclusions: The 1-year outcomes were similar for patients assigned to early surgery and those assigned to conservative treatment with eventual surgery if needed, but the rates of pain relief and of perceived recovery were faster for those assigned to early surgery. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN26872154 [controlled-trials.com].).

Citing Articles

Evidence from Mendelian randomization analysis combined with meta-analysis for the causal validation of the relationship between 91 inflammatory factors and lumbar disc herniation.

Yang J, Xu W, Chen D, Liu Y, Hu X Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 103(47):e40323.

PMID: 39809179 PMC: 11596353. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040323.


Prevalence of lumbar disc herniation and its associated factors: A cross-sectional study in Gansu.

Chen Z, Zhao J, Wang L, Shao H, Cao L, He X PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0310550.

PMID: 39739906 PMC: 11687716. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310550.


Early therapeutic efficacy of condoliase chemonucleolysis for lumbar disc herniation.

Kobayashi K, Sato K, Morita Y J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):890.

PMID: 39734224 PMC: 11684254. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05405-4.


Patient lived experiences of functioning and disability following lumbar discectomy: a secondary analysis of qualitative data.

Mistry J, White L, Baraks K, Davis C, Parikh P, Schabrun S BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):731.

PMID: 39267017 PMC: 11395569. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07790-7.


[Conservative combination therapy of sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation with mechanical physiotherapy (McKenzie), gabapentin, and transforaminal epidural injections].

Jantsch-Rieckert M, Rommel O, Kastner V, Maercklin-Rommel L, Jager G Schmerz. 2024; .

PMID: 39134776 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-024-00824-y.