» Articles » PMID: 17284312

Reduced Efficacy of Selection in Regions of the Drosophila Genome That Lack Crossing over

Overview
Journal Genome Biol
Specialties Biology
Genetics
Date 2007 Feb 8
PMID 17284312
Citations 86
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The recombinational environment is predicted to influence patterns of protein sequence evolution through the effects of Hill-Robertson interference among linked sites subject to selection. In freely recombining regions of the genome, selection should more effectively incorporate new beneficial mutations, and eliminate deleterious ones, than in regions with low rates of genetic recombination.

Results: We examined the effects of recombinational environment on patterns of evolution using a genome-wide comparison of Drosophila melanogaster and D. yakuba. In regions of the genome with no crossing over, we find elevated divergence at nonsynonymous sites and in long introns, a virtual absence of codon usage bias, and an increase in gene length. However, we find little evidence for differences in patterns of evolution between regions with high, intermediate, and low crossover frequencies. In addition, genes on the fourth chromosome exhibit more extreme deviations from regions with crossing over than do other, no crossover genes outside the fourth chromosome.

Conclusion: All of the patterns observed are consistent with a severe reduction in the efficacy of selection in the absence of crossing over, resulting in the accumulation of deleterious mutations in these regions. Our results also suggest that even a very low frequency of crossing over may be enough to maintain the efficacy of selection.

Citing Articles

Causes and consequences of a complex recombinational landscape in the ant .

Errbii M, Gadau J, Becker K, Schrader L, Oettler J Genome Res. 2024; 34(6):863-876.

PMID: 38839375 PMC: 11293551. DOI: 10.1101/gr.278392.123.


Deleterious phenotypes in wild Arabidopsis arenosa populations are common and linked to runs of homozygosity.

Barragan A, Collenberg M, Schwab R, Kersten S, Kerstens M, Pozarova D G3 (Bethesda). 2023; 14(3).

PMID: 38124484 PMC: 10917499. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkad290.


Nascent evolution of recombination rate differences as a consequence of chromosomal rearrangements.

Nasvall K, Boman J, Hook L, Vila R, Wiklund C, Backstrom N PLoS Genet. 2023; 19(8):e1010717.

PMID: 37549188 PMC: 10434929. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010717.


Somatic mutations during rapid clonal domestication of var. .

Zheng Z, Hu H, Lei W, Zhang J, Zhu M, Li Y Evol Appl. 2022; 15(11):1875-1887.

PMID: 36426122 PMC: 9679227. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13486.


The impact of frequently neglected model violations on bacterial recombination rate estimation: a case study in Mycobacterium canettii and Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Sabin S, Morales-Arce A, Pfeifer S, Jensen J G3 (Bethesda). 2022; 12(5).

PMID: 35253851 PMC: 9073693. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac055.


References
1.
Langley C, Lazzaro B, Phillips W, Heikkinen E, Braverman J . Linkage disequilibria and the site frequency spectra in the su(s) and su(w(a)) regions of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome. Genetics. 2000; 156(4):1837-52. PMC: 1461393. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.1837. View

2.
Marais G, Domazet-Loso T, Tautz D, Charlesworth B . Correlated evolution of synonymous and nonsynonymous sites in Drosophila. J Mol Evol. 2004; 59(6):771-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00239-004-2671-2. View

3.
Kliman R, Hey J . Hill-Robertson interference in Drosophila melanogaster: reply to Marais, Mouchiroud and Duret. Genet Res. 2003; 81(2):89-90. DOI: 10.1017/s0016672302006067. View

4.
Hey J, Kliman R . Interactions between natural selection, recombination and gene density in the genes of Drosophila. Genetics. 2002; 160(2):595-608. PMC: 1461979. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/160.2.595. View

5.
Welch J . Estimating the genomewide rate of adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila. Genetics. 2006; 173(2):821-37. PMC: 1526489. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.056911. View