» Articles » PMID: 11861564

Interactions Between Natural Selection, Recombination and Gene Density in the Genes of Drosophila

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2002 Feb 28
PMID 11861564
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In Drosophila, as in many organisms, natural selection leads to high levels of codon bias in genes that are highly expressed. Thus codon bias is an indicator of the intensity of one kind of selection that is experienced by genes and can be used to assess the impact of other genomic factors on natural selection. Among 13,000 genes in the Drosophila genome, codon bias has a slight positive, and strongly significant, association with recombination--as expected if recombination allows natural selection to act more efficiently when multiple linked sites segregate functional variation. The same reasoning leads to the expectation that the efficiency of selection, and thus average codon bias, should decline with gene density. However, this prediction is not confirmed. Levels of codon bias and gene expression are highest for those genes in an intermediate range of gene density, a pattern that may be the result of a tradeoff between the advantages for gene expression of close gene spacing and disadvantages arising from regulatory conflicts among tightly packed genes. These factors appear to overlay the more subtle effect of linkage among selected sites that gives rise to the association between recombination rate and codon bias.

Citing Articles

A new comparative framework for estimating selection on synonymous substitutions.

Verdonk H, Pivirotto A, Pavinato V, Hey J, Pond S bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39975314 PMC: 11838523. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.17.613331.


Meiotic, genomic and evolutionary properties of crossover distribution in Drosophila yakuba.

Pettie N, Llopart A, Comeron J PLoS Genet. 2022; 18(3):e1010087.

PMID: 35320272 PMC: 8979470. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010087.


Genome-wide analysis of codon usage in sesame ( L.).

Andargie M, Congyi Z Heliyon. 2022; 8(1):e08687.

PMID: 35106386 PMC: 8789531. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08687.


Analysis of Codon Usage Patterns in Based on Transcriptome Data from DB.

Li X, Wang X, Gong P, Zhang N, Zhang X, Li J Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(8).

PMID: 34440343 PMC: 8393687. DOI: 10.3390/genes12081169.


Weak selection on synonymous codons substantially inflates estimates in bacteria.

Rahman S, Kosakovsky Pond S, Webb A, Hey J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(20).

PMID: 33972434 PMC: 8157954. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2023575118.


References
1.
Sun F, Cuaycong M, Craig C, Wallrath L, Locke J, Elgin S . The fourth chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster: interspersed euchromatic and heterochromatic domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(10):5340-5. PMC: 25830. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.090530797. View

2.
Adams M, Celniker S, Holt R, Evans C, Gocayne J, Amanatides P . The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2000; 287(5461):2185-95. DOI: 10.1126/science.287.5461.2185. View

3.
Farkas G, Leibovitch B, Elgin S . Chromatin organization and transcriptional control of gene expression in Drosophila. Gene. 2000; 253(2):117-36. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00240-7. View

4.
Cohen B, Mitra R, Hughes J, Church G . A computational analysis of whole-genome expression data reveals chromosomal domains of gene expression. Nat Genet. 2000; 26(2):183-6. DOI: 10.1038/79896. View

5.
Bell A, West A, Felsenfeld G . Insulators and boundaries: versatile regulatory elements in the eukaryotic genome. Science. 2001; 291(5503):447-50. DOI: 10.1126/science.291.5503.447. View