» Articles » PMID: 37549188

Nascent Evolution of Recombination Rate Differences As a Consequence of Chromosomal Rearrangements

Overview
Journal PLoS Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2023 Aug 7
PMID 37549188
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reshuffling of genetic variation occurs both by independent assortment of chromosomes and by homologous recombination. Such reshuffling can generate novel allele combinations and break linkage between advantageous and deleterious variants which increases both the potential and the efficacy of natural selection. Here we used high-density linkage maps to characterize global and regional recombination rate variation in two populations of the wood white butterfly (Leptidea sinapis) that differ considerably in their karyotype as a consequence of at least 27 chromosome fissions and fusions. The recombination data were compared to estimates of genetic diversity and measures of selection to assess the relationship between chromosomal rearrangements, crossing over, maintenance of genetic diversity and adaptation. Our data show that the recombination rate is influenced by both chromosome size and number, but that the difference in the number of crossovers between karyotypes is reduced as a consequence of a higher frequency of double crossovers in larger chromosomes. As expected from effects of selection on linked sites, we observed an overall positive association between recombination rate and genetic diversity in both populations. Our results also revealed a significant effect of chromosomal rearrangements on the rate of intergenic diversity change between populations, but limited effects on polymorphisms in coding sequence. We conclude that chromosomal rearrangements can have considerable effects on the recombination landscape and consequently influence both maintenance of genetic diversity and efficiency of selection in natural populations.

Citing Articles

Genomic Monitoring of a Reintroduced Butterfly Uncovers Contrasting Founder Lineage Survival.

Halford G, Maes D, Yung C, Whiteford S, Bourn N, Bulman C Evol Appl. 2025; 18(2):e70074.

PMID: 39925617 PMC: 11802331. DOI: 10.1111/eva.70074.


Centromere diversity and its evolutionary impacts on plant karyotypes and plant reproduction.

Steckenborn S, Marques A New Phytol. 2025; 245(5):1879-1886.

PMID: 39763092 PMC: 11798908. DOI: 10.1111/nph.20376.


Neo-Sex Chromosome Evolution in Treehoppers Despite Long-Term X Chromosome Conservation.

Palmer Droguett D, Fletcher M, Alston B, Kocher S, Cabral-de-Mello D, Wright A Genome Biol Evol. 2024; 16(12).

PMID: 39657114 PMC: 11662286. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evae264.


Annelid Comparative Genomics and the Evolution of Massive Lineage-Specific Genome Rearrangement in Bilaterians.

Lewin T, Liao I, Luo Y Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(9).

PMID: 39141777 PMC: 11371463. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae172.


Meiotic drive against chromosome fusions in butterfly hybrids.

Boman J, Wiklund C, Vila R, Backstrom N Chromosome Res. 2024; 32(2):7.

PMID: 38702576 PMC: 11068667. DOI: 10.1007/s10577-024-09752-0.


References
1.
Lukhtanov V, Dinca V, Friberg M, Sichova J, Olofsson M, Vila R . Versatility of multivalent orientation, inverted meiosis, and rescued fitness in holocentric chromosomal hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(41):E9610-E9619. PMC: 6187165. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1802610115. View

2.
Rodgers-Melnick E, Bradbury P, Elshire R, Glaubitz J, Acharya C, Mitchell S . Recombination in diverse maize is stable, predictable, and associated with genetic load. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(12):3823-8. PMC: 4378432. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1413864112. View

3.
Davey J, Chouteau M, Barker S, Maroja L, Baxter S, Simpson F . Major Improvements to the Heliconius melpomene Genome Assembly Used to Confirm 10 Chromosome Fusion Events in 6 Million Years of Butterfly Evolution. G3 (Bethesda). 2016; 6(3):695-708. PMC: 4777131. DOI: 10.1534/g3.115.023655. View

4.
Cutter A, Baird S, Charlesworth D . High nucleotide polymorphism and rapid decay of linkage disequilibrium in wild populations of Caenorhabditis remanei. Genetics. 2006; 174(2):901-13. PMC: 1602088. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.061879. View

5.
Barnes T, Kohara Y, Coulson A, Hekimi S . Meiotic recombination, noncoding DNA and genomic organization in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1995; 141(1):159-79. PMC: 1206715. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.159. View