Choice Behavior and the Accessibility of the Reinforcer
Overview
Social Sciences
Authors
Affiliations
In Experiment 1, matching of relative response rates to relative rates of reinforcement was obtained in concurrent variable-interval schedules when the absolute values of the two concurrent variable-interval schedules varied from 6 sec and 12 sec to 600 sec and 1200 sec. Increases in the duration of the changeover delay, however, produced decreases in the relative response rates and, consequently, some deviation from matching. In Experiment 2, matching of relative response rates to the relative duration of the reinforcer failed to occur when the equal variable-interval schedules arranging access to the two different reinforcer durations (1.5 and 6 sec) were varied in size from concurrent variable-interval 10-sec schedules to concurrent variable-interval 600-sec schedules.
"Distractor" effects in delay discounting of probability by pigeons.
Mueller P, Peng D, Zentall T Anim Cogn. 2023; 26(3):1073-1081.
PMID: 36853524 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-023-01759-0.
Relative reinforcer rates and magnitudes do not control concurrent choice independently.
Elliffe D, Davison M, Landon J J Exp Anal Behav. 2008; 90(2):169-85.
PMID: 18831124 PMC: 2531519. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-169.
A model for residence time in concurrent variable interval performance.
Navakatikyan M J Exp Anal Behav. 2007; 87(1):121-41.
PMID: 17345955 PMC: 1790879. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2007.01-06.
Concurrent choice: Effects of overall reinforcer rate and the temporal distribution of reinforcers.
Elliffe D, Alsop B J Exp Anal Behav. 1996; 65(2):445-63.
PMID: 16812806 PMC: 1350157. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-445.
Concurrent schedules: Interaction of reinforcer frequency and reinforcer duration.
Davison M J Exp Anal Behav. 1988; 49(3):339-49.
PMID: 16812544 PMC: 1338795. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-339.