» Articles » PMID: 16812230

Conditioned Reinforcement As a Function of Duration of Stimulus

Overview
Date 1981 Jul 1
PMID 16812230
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pigeons were provided with three keys. Pecking the center key produced grain on a schedule that alternated at unpredictable times between a variable-interval component and extinction. On concurrent variable-interval schedules, pecking either side key produced a stimulus associated with the variable-interval component on the center key provided that said schedule was currently in effect. The independent variable was the length of time this stimulus remained on the keys. Pecking one side key produced the stimulus for 27 seconds, whereas the duration produced by pecking the other key varied for successive blocks of sessions. For the first four birds, the values tested were 3, 9, 27, and 81 seconds. For the second group, numbering three birds, the values tested were 1, 3, 9, and 27 seconds. The dependent variable was the proportion of total side key pecks that occurred on the variable key. For all birds, the function was positive in slope and negative in acceleration. This finding supports a formulation that ascribes the maintenance of observing responses in a normal setting to the fact that the subject exposes itself to the positive discriminative stimulus for a longer mean duration than it does to the negative stimulus.

Citing Articles

Resistance to change and relapse of observing.

Thrailkill E, Shahan T J Exp Anal Behav. 2012; 97(3):281-304.

PMID: 22693359 PMC: 3372953. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2012.97-281.


Conditioned reinforcement and response strength.

Shahan T J Exp Anal Behav. 2010; 93(2):269-89.

PMID: 20885815 PMC: 2831656. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-269.


The generality of nicotine as a reinforcer enhancer in rats: effects on responding maintained by primary and conditioned reinforcers and resistance to extinction.

Raiff B, Dallery J Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008; 201(2):305-14.

PMID: 18695928 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-008-1282-9.


Conditioned reinforcement value and resistance to change.

Shahan T, Podlesnik C J Exp Anal Behav. 2008; 89(3):263-98.

PMID: 18540215 PMC: 2373769. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2008-89-263.


The effect of negative stimulus presentations on observing-response rates.

Mueller K, Dinsmoor J J Exp Anal Behav. 1986; 46(3):281-91.

PMID: 16812463 PMC: 1348267. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-281.


References
1.
Herrnstein R . SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964; 7:27-36. PMC: 1404366. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-27. View

2.
Fantino E, Squires N, Delbruck N, Peterson C . Choice behavior and the accessibility of the reinforcer. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972; 18(1):35-43. PMC: 1333982. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-35. View

3.
Catania A . Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963; 6:299-300. PMC: 1404290. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-299. View

4.
Egger M, MILLER N . Secondary reinforcement in rats as a function of information value and reliability of the stimulus. J Exp Psychol. 1962; 64:97-104. DOI: 10.1037/h0040364. View

5.
WYCKOFF L . Toward a quantitative theory of secondary reinforcement. Psychol Rev. 1959; 66(1):68-78. DOI: 10.1037/h0046882. View