» Articles » PMID: 16811486

A Model for Choice in Simple Concurrent and Concurrent-chains Schedules

Overview
Date 1971 Jan 1
PMID 16811486
Citations 99
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pigeons' responses in the presence of two concurrently available (initial-link) stimuli produced one of two different (terminal-link) stimuli. Entrance into the mutually exclusive terminal links was arranged by different and independent variable-interval schedules for each key, while responses during the mutually exclusive terminal-link stimuli produced a single food reinforcement according to indentical and independent variable-interval schedules. The pigeons emitted more initial-link responses on the key with the shorter average interreinforcement interval in the initial link. This difference in initial-link response rates varied directly with the difference between the average inter-reinforcement intervals of the initial-link schedules and decreased when the initial-link schedule with the longer average interreinforcement interval was followed by several consecutive food reinforcements on the variable-interval schedule in the terminal link on that key. These results are incompatible with previous formulations of choice behavior with the concurrent-chains procedure. A modified formulation with a multiplier for the overall rate of primary reinforcement obtained on each key provides a better description of choice. In addition, the new formulation applies to behavior in simple (concurrent) choice situations, an advantage not achieved by previous formulations.

Citing Articles

Temporal context effects on suboptimal choice.

McDevitt M, Pisklak J, Dunn R, Spetch M Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 31(6):2737-2745.

PMID: 38760618 PMC: 11680616. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02519-y.


Temporal integration and instrumental conditioned reinforcement.

Thrailkill E, Shahan T Learn Behav. 2014; 42(3):201-8.

PMID: 24879632 PMC: 4766005. DOI: 10.3758/s13420-014-0138-x.


Effects of pre-trial response requirements on self-control choices by rats and pigeons.

Mazur J J Exp Anal Behav. 2012; 97(2):215-30.

PMID: 22389527 PMC: 3292232. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2012.97-215.


Concurrent-chains schedules as a method to study choice between alcohol-associated conditioned reinforcers.

Jimenez-Gomez C, Shahan T J Exp Anal Behav. 2012; 97(1):71-83.

PMID: 22287805 PMC: 3266740. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2012.97-71.


Temporal context, preference, and resistance to change.

Podlesnik C, Jimenez-Gomez C, Thrailkill E, Shahan T J Exp Anal Behav. 2011; 96(2):191-213.

PMID: 21909164 PMC: 3168887. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-191.


References
1.
Fantino E . Effects of required rates of responding upon choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968; 11(1):15-22. PMC: 1338438. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-15. View

2.
Fantino E, Herrnstein R . Secondary reinforcement and number of primary reinforcements. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968; 11(1):9-14. PMC: 1338437. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-9. View

3.
Killeen P . On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968; 11(3):263-9. PMC: 1338484. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-263. View

4.
Shull R, Pliskoff S . Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967; 10(6):517-27. PMC: 1338422. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-517. View

5.
Herrnstein R . Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961; 4:267-72. PMC: 1404074. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267. View