Delmas G, Lew S, Zanutto B
PLoS One. 2019; 14(1):e0204837.
PMID: 30601809
PMC: 6314613.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204837.
Reilly M, Posadas-Sanchez D, Kettle L, Killeen P
Behav Processes. 2012; 91(3):236-43.
PMID: 22989930
PMC: 3532893.
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.09.002.
Kobayashi S, Schultz W, Sakagami M
J Neurophysiol. 2010; 103(4):1843-55.
PMID: 20107129
PMC: 2853276.
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00173.2009.
Sanabria F, Thrailkill E
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009; 91(2):169-83.
PMID: 19794832
PMC: 2648521.
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-169.
Rickard J, Body S, Zhang Z, Bradshaw C, Szabadi E
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009; 91(1):75-87.
PMID: 19230513
PMC: 2614819.
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-75.
Differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate-schedule performance and nicotine administration: a systematic investigation of dose, dose-regimen, and schedule requirement.
Kirshenbaum A, Brown S, Hughes D, Doughty A
Behav Pharmacol. 2008; 19(7):683-97.
PMID: 18797245
PMC: 2947329.
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328315ecbb.
Effect of quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on performance on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement: implications for inter-temporal choice.
Bezzina G, Body S, Cheung T, Hampson C, Deakin J, Anderson I
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008; 197(2):339-50.
PMID: 18167622
PMC: 2668651.
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-007-1036-0.
A brief opportunity to run does not function as a reinforcer for mice selected for high daily wheel-running rates.
Belke T, Garland Jr T
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007; 88(2):199-213.
PMID: 17970415
PMC: 1986434.
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2007.62-06.
Is matching innate?.
Gallistel C, King A, Gottlieb D, Balci F, Papachristos E, Szalecki M
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007; 87(2):161-99.
PMID: 17465311
PMC: 1832166.
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2007.92-05.
Economics, ecologics, and mechanics: The dynamics of responding under conditions of varying motivation.
Killeen P
J Exp Anal Behav. 1995; 64(3):405-31.
PMID: 16812776
PMC: 1350147.
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-405.
Multiple determinants of the effects of reinforcement magnitude on free-operant response rates.
Reed P
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991; 55(1):109-23.
PMID: 16812628
PMC: 1322981.
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-109.
Concurrent schedules: Interaction of reinforcer frequency and reinforcer duration.
Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav. 1988; 49(3):339-49.
PMID: 16812544
PMC: 1338795.
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-339.
Effects of magnitude of food reinforcement on free-operant response rates.
Reed P, Wright J
J Exp Anal Behav. 1988; 49(1):75-85.
PMID: 16812533
PMC: 1338827.
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-75.
The maximization of overall reinforcement rate on concurrent chains.
Houston A, Sumida B, McNamara J
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987; 48(1):133-43.
PMID: 16812485
PMC: 1338748.
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-133.
Does satiation close the open economy?.
Posadas-Sanchez D, Killeen P
Learn Behav. 2006; 33(4):387-98.
PMID: 16573210
PMC: 1456067.
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193178.
A neural network model of foraging decisions made under predation risk.
Coleman S, Brown V, Levine D, Mellgren R
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2006; 5(4):434-51.
PMID: 16541813
DOI: 10.3758/cabn.5.4.434.
Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement?.
Grace R, Bragason O
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005; 83(2):169-84.
PMID: 15828593
PMC: 1193745.
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2005.28-04.
Unit price and choice in a token-reinforcement context.
Foster T, Hackenberg T
J Exp Anal Behav. 2004; 81(1):5-25.
PMID: 15113130
PMC: 1284968.
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2004.81-5.
Arousal, changeover responses, and preference in concurrent schedules.
McDevitt M, Williams B
J Exp Anal Behav. 2004; 80(3):261-72.
PMID: 14964707
PMC: 1284959.
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2003.80-261.
Effects of reinforcer magnitude on responding under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules of rats and pigeons.
Doughty A, Richards J
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002; 78(1):17-30.
PMID: 12144310
PMC: 1284886.
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-17.