Response Rate As a Function of Amount of Reinforcement for a Signalled Concurrent Response
Overview
Social Sciences
Affiliations
Pigeons were exposed to two equal, concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement on two response keys. One key was continuously illuminated. Pecking on that key produced reinforcements of constant duration. The other key was normally dark, except that availability of reinforcement was signalled by illuminating the key. The duration of access to a grain reinforcer was varied on the key that signalled reinforcement. Rate of response on the first key, the one that did not signal reinforcement, was found to vary inversely with duration of signalled reinforcement on the other key. The latency between the signal and the peck that produced signalled reinforcement remained about constant. These results show that responding on one key in concurrent variable-interval schedules depends on the reinforcement delivered by both schedules and is independent of responding on the other key.
The Verbal Behavior Stimulus Control Ratio Equation: a Quantification of Language.
Mason L, Andrews A Perspect Behav Sci. 2020; 42(2):323-343.
PMID: 31976437 PMC: 6701728. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-018-0141-1.
Suboptimal choice in rats: Incentive salience attribution promotes maladaptive decision-making.
Chow J, Smith A, George Wilson A, Zentall T, Beckmann J Behav Brain Res. 2016; 320:244-254.
PMID: 27993692 PMC: 5241164. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.12.013.
The stay/switch model describes choice among magnitudes of reinforcers.
MacDonall J Behav Processes. 2008; 78(2):173-84.
PMID: 18406545 PMC: 2488404. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.03.002.
McLean A, Blampied N J Exp Anal Behav. 1995; 63(1):1-17.
PMID: 16812750 PMC: 1334377. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-1.
Reinforcement magnitude and the inhibiting effect of reinforcement.
Michael J J Exp Anal Behav. 1979; 32(2):265-8.
PMID: 16812150 PMC: 1332901. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-265.