» Articles » PMID: 16811331

Response Rate As a Function of Amount of Reinforcement for a Signalled Concurrent Response

Overview
Date 1969 Jan 1
PMID 16811331
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pigeons were exposed to two equal, concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement on two response keys. One key was continuously illuminated. Pecking on that key produced reinforcements of constant duration. The other key was normally dark, except that availability of reinforcement was signalled by illuminating the key. The duration of access to a grain reinforcer was varied on the key that signalled reinforcement. Rate of response on the first key, the one that did not signal reinforcement, was found to vary inversely with duration of signalled reinforcement on the other key. The latency between the signal and the peck that produced signalled reinforcement remained about constant. These results show that responding on one key in concurrent variable-interval schedules depends on the reinforcement delivered by both schedules and is independent of responding on the other key.

Citing Articles

The Verbal Behavior Stimulus Control Ratio Equation: a Quantification of Language.

Mason L, Andrews A Perspect Behav Sci. 2020; 42(2):323-343.

PMID: 31976437 PMC: 6701728. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-018-0141-1.


Suboptimal choice in rats: Incentive salience attribution promotes maladaptive decision-making.

Chow J, Smith A, George Wilson A, Zentall T, Beckmann J Behav Brain Res. 2016; 320:244-254.

PMID: 27993692 PMC: 5241164. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.12.013.


The stay/switch model describes choice among magnitudes of reinforcers.

MacDonall J Behav Processes. 2008; 78(2):173-84.

PMID: 18406545 PMC: 2488404. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.03.002.


Resistance to reinforcement change in multiple and concurrent schedules assessed in transition and at steady state.

McLean A, Blampied N J Exp Anal Behav. 1995; 63(1):1-17.

PMID: 16812750 PMC: 1334377. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-1.


Reinforcement magnitude and the inhibiting effect of reinforcement.

Michael J J Exp Anal Behav. 1979; 32(2):265-8.

PMID: 16812150 PMC: 1332901. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-265.


References
1.
Findley J . Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958; 1(2):123-44. PMC: 1403923. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-123. View

2.
Herrnstein R . SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964; 7:27-36. PMC: 1404366. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-27. View

3.
Catania A . Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963; 6:299-300. PMC: 1404290. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-299. View

4.
FLESHLER M, Hoffman H . A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962; 5:529-30. PMC: 1404199. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529. View

5.
Catania A . Behavioral contrast in a multiple and concurrent schedule of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961; 4:335-42. PMC: 1404155. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-335. View