Support Line and Tube Visibility in Chest Examinations Using Computed Radiography

Overview

Journal J Digit Imaging

Publisher Springer

Specialties Medical Informatics
Radiology

Date 1997 Aug 1

PMID 9268908

Authors

W Huda

C J Belden

L A Webb

C K Palmer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The visibility of support lines and tubes was compared in computed radiography (CR) and screen-film adult chest radiographs. Parameters investigated were radiation dose, image minification, and the use of unsharp mask enhancement. Five radiologists rated the visibility of support lines and tubes on a five-point scale ranging from 1 (entire course of line visible) to 5 (line not visible or only small portion seen). These CR results were compared with the visibility of support lines and tubes as assessed by the same readers for conventional screen-film radiographs (600 speed). Support line and tube visibility improved with image enhancement, image minification, and increasing radiation dose. At the same radiation exposure, support line and tube visibility of the screen-film combination was superior to that of standard CR images. Application of an unsharp mask enhancement algorithm to CR images, however, significantly improved support line and tube visibility in comparison to that obtained with the screen-film combination. It was concluded that unsharp mask processing is a valuable tool for improving the visibility of support lines and tubes in CR chest radiographs.

References

Sonoda M, Takano M, Miyahara J, Kato H . Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Radiology. 1983; 148(3):833-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878707. View

Huda W, Honeyman J, Frost M, Staab E . A cost-analysis of computed radiography and picture archiving and communication systems in portable radiography. J Digit Imaging. 1996; 9(1):39-44. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168567. View

Fujita H, Ueda K, Morishita J, Fujikawa T, Ohtsuka A, Sai T . Basic imaging properties of a computed radiographic system with photostimulable phosphors. Med Phys. 1989; 16(1):52-9. DOI: 10.1118/1.596402. View

Oestmann J, Greene R, Rubens J, Hall D, Robertson C, Llewellyn H . High frequency edge enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines. Parity between storage phosphor digital images and conventional chest radiography. Invest Radiol. 1989; 24(9):643-6. DOI: 10.1097/00004424-198909000-00001. View

Schaefer C, Greene R, Oestmann J, Kamalsky J, Hall D, Llewellyn H . Improved control of image optical density with low-dose digital and conventional radiography in bedside imaging. Radiology. 1989; 173(3):713-6. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.173.3.2813775. View

Thompson M, Kubicka R, Smith C . Evaluation of cardiopulmonary devices on chest radiographs: digital vs analog radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989; 153(6):1165-8. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.153.6.1165. View

Prokop M, Galanski M, Oestmann J, von Falkenhausen U, Rosenthal H, Reimer P . Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects. Radiology. 1990; 177(1):109-13. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.177.1.2399307. View

Kehler M, Albrechtsson U, Andresdottir A, Bradvik I, Hochbergs P, Larusdottir H . Digital luminescence radiography in interstitial lung disease. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. Acta Radiol. 1991; 32(1):18-23. View

Sanada S, Doi K, Xu X, Yin F, Giger M, Macmahon H . Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems. Med Phys. 1991; 18(3):414-20. DOI: 10.1118/1.596688. View

10.

Miettunen R, Korhola O . The effect of digital unsharp-mask filtering on the signal-to-noise ratio in computed radiography. Eur J Radiol. 1991; 13(3):225-8. DOI: 10.1016/0720-048x(91)90035-t. View

11.

Galanski M, Prokop M, Thorns E, Oestmann J, Reichelt S, Haubitz B . [The visibility of a central venous catheter using digital luminescence radiography in intensive care radiology]. Rofo. 1992; 156(1):68-72. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1032838. View

12.

Dobbins 3rd J, Rice J, Beam C, Ravin C . Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography. Radiology. 1992; 183(1):179-87. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.183.1.1549669. View

13.

Schaefer C, Prokop M, Oestmann J, WIESMANN W, Haubitz B, Meschede A . Impact of hard-copy size on observer performance in digital chest radiography. Radiology. 1992; 184(1):77-81. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.184.1.1609106. View

14.

Chotas H, Ravin C . Digital radiography with photostimulable storage phosphors. Control of detector latitude in chest imaging. Invest Radiol. 1992; 27(10):822-8. DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199210000-00012. View

15.

Jennings P, Padley S, Hansell D . Portable chest radiography in intensive care: a comparison of computed and conventional radiography. Br J Radiol. 1992; 65(778):852-6. DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-778-852. View

16.

Schaefer C, Prokop M . Storage phosphor radiography of the chest. Radiology. 1993; 186(2):314-5. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.186.2.8421725. View

17.

Niklason L, Chan H, Cascade P, Chang C, Chee P, Mathews J . Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems. Radiology. 1993; 186(2):387-93. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.186.2.8421740. View

18.

Cowen A, Workman A, Price J . Physical aspects of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography. Br J Radiol. 1993; 66(784):332-45. DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-66-784-332. View

19.

Silverstein D, Livingston D, Elcavage J, Kovar L, Kelly K . The utility of routine daily chest radiography in the surgical intensive care unit. J Trauma. 1993; 35(4):643-6. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199310000-00022. View

20.

Wandtke J . Bedside chest radiography. Radiology. 1994; 190(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.190.1.8043058. View