» Articles » PMID: 1870484

Comparison of Imaging Properties of a Computed Radiography System and Screen-film Systems

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 1991 May 1
PMID 1870484
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To compare the diagnostic quality of images obtained with a computed radiography (CR) system based on storage phosphor technology with that obtained with conventional screen-film systems, a dual-image recording technique was devised. With this technique, a CR imaging plate is placed behind a screen-film system in a conventional cassette. This makes it possible to obtain two images simultaneously, one from each system, in a clinical examination with the same patient positioning, the same degree of patient motion, the same geometric unsharpness, and no additional exposure. The modulation transfer functions (MTFs) of the CR system with and without the dual-image recording technique were greater at low frequencies, but lower at high frequencies, that the MTFs of the screen-film systems used. The noise Wiener spectra of the CR images at the plane of the imaging plate were greater than those of the screen-film systems, but were comparable to those of the screen-film systems at the plane of the printed film due to the reduction in image size. Clinical chest images obtained with the dual-image recording technique appeared comparable, probably because of the image size reduction and the use of mild unsharp mask processing.

Citing Articles

Basic imaging properties of an indirect flat-panel detector system employing irradiation side sampling (ISS) technology for chest radiography: comparison with a computed radiographic system.

Tanaka N, Yano Y, Yabuuchi H, Akasaka T, Sasaki M, Ohki M Radiol Phys Technol. 2012; 6(1):162-9.

PMID: 23143711 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-012-0184-z.


Investigation of optimum anti-scatter grid selection for digital radiography: physical imaging properties and detectability of low-contrast signals.

Tanaka N, Naka K, Saito A, Morishita J, Toyofuku F, Ohki M Radiol Phys Technol. 2012; 6(1):54-60.

PMID: 22872419 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-012-0169-y.


Perception of anatomical structures in digitally filtered and conventional panoramic radiographs: a clinical evaluation.

Baksi B, Alpoz E, Sogur E, Mert A Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39(7):424-30.

PMID: 20841460 PMC: 3520188. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/30570374.


Modeling the performance characteristics of computed radiography (CR) systems.

Vedantham S, Karellas A IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010; 29(3):790-806.

PMID: 20199915 PMC: 5228607. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2036995.


Support line and tube visibility in chest examinations using computed radiography.

Huda W, Belden C, Webb L, Palmer C J Digit Imaging. 1997; 10(3):126-31.

PMID: 9268908 PMC: 3452951. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168600.