» Articles » PMID: 18622036

Chromosomal Rearrangement Inferred from Comparisons of 12 Drosophila Genomes

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2008 Jul 16
PMID 18622036
Citations 120
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The availability of 12 complete genomes of various species of genus Drosophila provides a unique opportunity to analyze genome-scale chromosomal rearrangements among a group of closely related species. This article reports on the comparison of gene order between these 12 species and on the fixed rearrangement events that disrupt gene order. Three major themes are addressed: the conservation of syntenic blocks across species, the disruption of syntenic blocks (via chromosomal inversion events) and its relationship to the phylogenetic distribution of these species, and the rate of rearrangement events over evolutionary time. Comparison of syntenic blocks across this large genomic data set confirms that genetic elements are largely (95%) localized to the same Muller element across genus Drosophila species and paracentric inversions serve as the dominant mechanism for shuffling the order of genes along a chromosome. Gene-order scrambling between species is in accordance with the estimated evolutionary distances between them and we find it to approximate a linear process over time (linear to exponential with alternate divergence time estimates). We find the distribution of synteny segment sizes to be biased by a large number of small segments with comparatively fewer large segments. Our results provide estimated chromosomal evolution rates across this set of species on the basis of whole-genome synteny analysis, which are found to be higher than those previously reported. Identification of conserved syntenic blocks across these genomes suggests a large number of conserved blocks with varying levels of embryonic expression correlation in Drosophila melanogaster. On the other hand, an analysis of the disruption of syntenic blocks between species allowed the identification of fixed inversion breakpoints and estimates of breakpoint reuse and lineage-specific breakpoint event segregation.

Citing Articles

Complex Genomic Landscape of Inversion Polymorphism in Europe's Most Destructive Forest Pest.

Mykhailenko A, Zielinski P, Bednarz A, Schlyter F, Andersson M, Antunes B Genome Biol Evol. 2024; 16(12).

PMID: 39656753 PMC: 11652730. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evae263.


A comparative analysis of planarian genomes reveals regulatory conservation in the face of rapid structural divergence.

Ivankovic M, Brand J, Pandolfini L, Brown T, Pippel M, Rozanski A Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8215.

PMID: 39294119 PMC: 11410931. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52380-9.


Fundamental Patterns of Structural Evolution Revealed by Chromosome-Length Genomes of Cactophilic Drosophila.

Benowitz K, Allan C, Jaworski C, Sanderson M, Diaz F, Chen X Genome Biol Evol. 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 39228294 PMC: 11411373. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evae191.


The NCBI Comparative Genome Viewer (CGV) is an interactive visualization tool for the analysis of whole-genome eukaryotic alignments.

Rangwala S, Rudnev D, Ananiev V, Oh D, Asztalos A, Benica B PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(5):e3002405.

PMID: 38713717 PMC: 11101090. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002405.


Comparative genomics reveals the dynamics of chromosome evolution in Lepidoptera.

Wright C, Stevens L, Mackintosh A, Lawniczak M, Blaxter M Nat Ecol Evol. 2024; 8(4):777-790.

PMID: 38383850 PMC: 11009112. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02329-4.


References
1.
Spradling A, STERN D, Kiss I, Roote J, Laverty T, Rubin G . Gene disruptions using P transposable elements: an integral component of the Drosophila genome project. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92(24):10824-30. PMC: 40524. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.24.10824. View

2.
Bellen H, Levis R, Liao G, He Y, Carlson J, Tsang G . The BDGP gene disruption project: single transposon insertions associated with 40% of Drosophila genes. Genetics. 2004; 167(2):761-81. PMC: 1470905. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.026427. View

3.
Ehrlich J, Sankoff D, Nadeau J . Synteny conservation and chromosome rearrangements during mammalian evolution. Genetics. 1997; 147(1):289-96. PMC: 1208112. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/147.1.289. View

4.
Bhutkar A, Russo S, Smith T, Gelbart W . Genome-scale analysis of positionally relocated genes. Genome Res. 2007; 17(12):1880-7. PMC: 2099595. DOI: 10.1101/gr.7062307. View

5.
Olvera O, Powell J, de la Rosa M, Salceda V, Gaso M, Guzman J . POPULATION GENETICS OF MEXICAN DROSOPHILA VI. CYTOGENETIC ASPECTS OF THE INVERSION POLYMORPHISM IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA. Evolution. 2017; 33(1Part2):381-395. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04691.x. View