» Articles » PMID: 34552114

Time-lapse Monitoring of Fertilized Human Oocytes Focused on the Incidence of 0PN Embryos in Conventional in Vitro Fertilization Cycles

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Sep 23
PMID 34552114
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We aimed to investigate why the incidence of embryos derived from oocytes with no pronuclei (0PN) decreases using time-lapse monitoring (TLM) versus fixed-point assessment in conventional IVF cycles. We analyzed 514 embryos monitored with TLM 6-9 h after insemination and 144 embryos monitored using microscopic assessment 18-21 h after insemination. The primary endpoint of this study was the incidence of 0PN-derived embryos in short insemination followed by TLM. The secondary endpoint was the duration of insemination. As exploratory endpoints, we analyzed the blastulation rate and cryo-warmed blastocyst transfer outcome of embryos with early PN fading, whereby PN disappeared within < 20 h following the initiation of insemination. The incidence of 0PN-derived embryo reduced more significantly through TLM than through fixed-point observation. The microscopic assessment time was more significantly delayed in the 0PN-derived embryo than that in the 2PN-derived embryo. The embryo with early PN fading formed good-quality blastocysts, and their pregnancy outcomes were similar to those of other embryos. Most 0PN-derived embryos in the fixed-point assessment might have resulted from missed observation of PN appearance in the early-cleaved embryos. TLM or strict laboratory schedule management may reduce 0PN-derived embryos by reducing missed PN observations.

Citing Articles

Developmental potential of zygotes without pronucleus (0PN) and pregnancy outcomes after single euploid blastocyst transfers.

Moon J, Zhang J, Yu B J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 39984800 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03430-8.


Use of time-lapse technology on fertilization verification, embryo evaluation, and utilization: A national survey in Japan.

Yamada M, Ezoe K, Ueno S, Yoshino O, Takahashi T AJOG Glob Rep. 2024; 4(4):100397.

PMID: 39493437 PMC: 11530904. DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100397.


Advanced age woman with diminished ovarian reserve obtained live birth following a zero pronuclei-derived four-cell frozen-thawed embryo transfer on day 4: a case report.

Zhang X, Chen Y, Zhang Y Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1462425.

PMID: 39380739 PMC: 11458402. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1462425.


Incidence of haploidy and triploidy in trophectoderm biopsies of blastocysts derived from normally and abnormally fertilized oocytes.

Girardi L, Patassini C, Miravet Valenciano J, Sato Y, Fagundes Cagnin N, Castellon J J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(12):3357-3370.

PMID: 39378000 PMC: 11707209. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03278-4.


Developmental perturbation in human embryos: Clinical and biological significance learned from time-lapse images.

Ezoe K, Takahashi T, Miki T, Kato K Reprod Med Biol. 2024; 23(1):e12593.

PMID: 38983691 PMC: 11232294. DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12593.


References
1.
Liu J, Wang X, Zhang X, Shen C, Zhang Z . Live births resulting from 0PN-derived embryos in conventional IVF cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016; 33(3):373-378. PMC: 4785154. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0644-6. View

2.
Noyes N, Fino M, Krey L, McCaffrey C, Adler A, Grifo J . Embryo biopsy: the fate of abnormal pronuclear embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008; 17(6):782-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60405-1. View

3.
Hondo S, Arichi A, Muramatsu H, Omura N, Ito K, Komine H . Clinical outcomes of transfer of frozen and thawed single blastocysts derived from nonpronuclear and monopronuclear zygotes. Reprod Med Biol. 2019; 18(3):278-283. PMC: 6613012. DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12275. View

4.
Li M, Lin S, Chen Y, Zhu J, Liu P, Qiao J . Value of transferring embryos that show no evidence of fertilization at the time of fertilization assessment. Fertil Steril. 2015; 104(3):607-11.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.016. View

5.
Kirkegaard K, Agerholm I, Ingerslev H . Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(5):1277-85. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des079. View