» Articles » PMID: 38532894

Developmental Potential of Non- and Mono-pronuclear Zygotes and Associated Clinical Outcomes in IVF Cycles

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2024 Mar 27
PMID 38532894
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the developmental potential of 0PN, 1PN, and 2PN zygotes in IVF cycles and compare their clinical outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving IVF patients. Blastocyst formation rates were assessed with 0PN, 1PN, and 2PN zygotes. Subsequently, we collected clinical outcome data following the transfer of these zygotes.

Results: The overall blastulation rate was similar between 0PN (29.6%) and 2PN (32.1%) zygotes, but 1PN zygotes exhibited a significantly lower blastulation rate (17.0%) compared to both 0PN and 2PN zygotes. Similarly, the overall rate of good-quality blastulation was comparable between 0PN (15.3%) and 2PN (17.5%) zygotes, while 1PN zygotes showed a significantly lower rate (7.0%) compared to both 0PN and 2PN. Clinical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, implantation, and live birth rates were similar among single blastocyst frozen embryo transfers (FET) of 0PN, 1PN, and 2PN. Additionally, no significant differences were observed between single- and double-blastocyst FET of 0PN and 2PN.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that 0PN and 2PN zygotes have comparable developmental potential, while 1PN embryos exhibit lower developmental potential. Blastocyst FET outcomes appear similar among 0PN, 1PN, and 2PN zygotes.

References
1.
Hondo S, Arichi A, Muramatsu H, Omura N, Ito K, Komine H . Clinical outcomes of transfer of frozen and thawed single blastocysts derived from nonpronuclear and monopronuclear zygotes. Reprod Med Biol. 2019; 18(3):278-283. PMC: 6613012. DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12275. View

2.
Staessen C, Janssenswillen C, Devroey P, van Steirteghem A . Cytogenetic and morphological observations of single pronucleated human oocytes after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1993; 8(2):221-3. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138026. View

3.
Huang L, Bogale B, Tang Y, Lu S, Xie X, Racowsky C . Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in spent medium may be more reliable than trophectoderm biopsy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(28):14105-14112. PMC: 6628824. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1907472116. View

4.
Scott K, Hong K, Scott Jr R . Selecting the optimal time to perform biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100(3):608-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.004. View

5.
Barrie A, Smith R, Campbell A, Fishel S . Optimisation of the timing of fertilisation assessment for oocytes cultured in standard incubation: lessons learnt from time-lapse imaging of 78 348 embryos. Hum Reprod. 2021; 36(11):2840-2847. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab209. View