Developmental Perturbation in Human Embryos: Clinical and Biological Significance Learned from Time-lapse Images

Overview

Journal Reprod Med Biol

Specialty Biology

Date 2024 Jul 10

PMID 38983691

Authors

Kenji Ezoe

Tsubasa Takahashi

Tetsuya Miki

Keiichi Kato

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Time-lapse technology (TLT) has gained widespread adoption worldwide. In addition to facilitating the undisturbed culture of embryos, TLT offers the unique capability of continuously monitoring embryos to detect spatiotemporal changes. Although these observed phenomena play a role in optimal embryo selection/deselection, the clinical advantages of introducing TLT remain unclear. However, manual annotation of embryo perturbation could facilitate a comprehensive assessment of developmental competence. This process requires a thorough understanding of embryo observation and the biological significance associated with developmental dogma and variation. This review elucidates the typical behavior and variation of each phenomenon, exploring their clinical significance and research perspectives.

Methods: The MEDLINE database was searched using PubMed for peer-reviewed English-language original articles concerning human embryo development.

Main Findings: TLT allows the observation of consecutive changes in embryo morphology, serving as potential biomarkers for embryo assessment. In assisted reproductive technology laboratories, several phenomena have not revealed their mechanism, posing difficulties such as fertilization deficiency and morula arrest.

Conclusion: A profound understanding of the biological mechanisms and significance of each phenomenon is crucial. Further collaborative efforts between the clinical and molecular fields following translational studies are required to advance embryonic outcomes and assessment.

Citing Articles

Preimplantation development analysis of aneuploid embryos with different chromosomal abnormalities.

Si K, Ma B, Bai J, Wu L, He H, Jin L Heliyon. 2024; 10(23):e40686.

PMID: 39687119 PMC: 11647804. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40686.

References

Halet G, Carroll J . Rac activity is polarized and regulates meiotic spindle stability and anchoring in mammalian oocytes. Dev Cell. 2007; 12(2):309-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.12.010. View

Van Blerkom J . Mitochondrial function in the human oocyte and embryo and their role in developmental competence. Mitochondrion. 2010; 11(5):797-813. DOI: 10.1016/j.mito.2010.09.012. View

Lagalla C, Coticchio G, Sciajno R, Tarozzi N, Zaca C, Borini A . Alternative patterns of partial embryo compaction: prevalence, morphokinetic history and possible implications. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020; 40(3):347-354. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.11.011. View

Tokai-Nishizumi N, Ohsugi M, Suzuki E, Yamamoto T . The chromokinesin Kid is required for maintenance of proper metaphase spindle size. Mol Biol Cell. 2005; 16(11):5455-63. PMC: 1266440. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e05-03-0244. View

Plusa B, Frankenberg S, Chalmers A, Hadjantonakis A, Moore C, Papalopulu N . Downregulation of Par3 and aPKC function directs cells towards the ICM in the preimplantation mouse embryo. J Cell Sci. 2005; 118(Pt 3):505-15. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.01666. View

Yi K, Unruh J, Deng M, Slaughter B, Rubinstein B, Li R . Dynamic maintenance of asymmetric meiotic spindle position through Arp2/3-complex-driven cytoplasmic streaming in mouse oocytes. Nat Cell Biol. 2011; 13(10):1252-8. PMC: 3523671. DOI: 10.1038/ncb2320. View

Magli M, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti A . Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001; 183 Suppl 1:S29-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0303-7207(01)00574-3. View

Stalf T, Herrero J, Mehnert C, Manolopoulos K, Lenhard A, Gips H . Influence of polarization effects in ooplasma and pronuclei on embryo quality and implantation in an IVF program. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002; 19(8):355-62. PMC: 3455581. DOI: 10.1023/a:1016300703430. View

Ergin E, Caliskan E, Yalcinkaya E, Oztel Z, Cokelez K, Ozay A . Frequency of embryo multinucleation detected by time-lapse system and its impact on pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril. 2014; 102(4):1029-1033.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.06.030. View

10.

Kirkegaard K, Kesmodel U, Hindkjaer J, Ingerslev H . Time-lapse parameters as predictors of blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome in embryos from good prognosis patients: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(10):2643-51. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det300. View

11.

Abbassi L, El-Hayek S, Carvalho K, Wang W, Yang Q, Granados-Aparici S . Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling uncouples germ cells from the somatic follicular compartment at ovulation. Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):1438. PMC: 7933413. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21644-z. View

12.

Baker N . Emerging mechanisms of cell competition. Nat Rev Genet. 2020; 21(11):683-697. PMC: 8205513. DOI: 10.1038/s41576-020-0262-8. View

13.

Ezoe K, Takahashi T, Shimazaki K, Miki T, Tanimura Y, Amagai A . Human 1PN and 3PN zygotes recapitulate all morphokinetic events of normal fertilization but reveal novel developmental errors. Hum Reprod. 2022; 37(10):2307-2319. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac177. View

14.

Kobayashi T, Ishikawa H, Ishii K, Sato A, Nakamura N, Saito Y . Time-lapse monitoring of fertilized human oocytes focused on the incidence of 0PN embryos in conventional in vitro fertilization cycles. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):18862. PMC: 8458381. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98312-1. View

15.

Liu J, Wang X, Zhang X, Shen C, Zhang Z . Live births resulting from 0PN-derived embryos in conventional IVF cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016; 33(3):373-378. PMC: 4785154. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0644-6. View

16.

Payne D, Flaherty S, Barry M, Matthews C . Preliminary observations on polar body extrusion and pronuclear formation in human oocytes using time-lapse video cinematography. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12(3):532-41. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/12.3.532. View

17.

Gerri C, McCarthy A, Alanis-Lobato G, Demtschenko A, Bruneau A, Loubersac S . Initiation of a conserved trophectoderm program in human, cow and mouse embryos. Nature. 2020; 587(7834):443-447. PMC: 7116563. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2759-x. View

18.

McCollin A, Swann R, Summers M, Handyside A, Ottolini C . Abnormal cleavage and developmental arrest of human preimplantation embryos in vitro. Eur J Med Genet. 2019; 63(2):103651. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.04.008. View

19.

Tesarik J, Greco E . The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(5):1318-23. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.5.1318. View

20.

Watson A . The cell biology of blastocyst development. Mol Reprod Dev. 1992; 33(4):492-504. DOI: 10.1002/mrd.1080330417. View