» Articles » PMID: 34321243

FLASH Proton Radiotherapy Spares Normal Epithelial and Mesenchymal Tissues While Preserving Sarcoma Response

Abstract

In studies of electron and proton radiotherapy, ultrahigh dose rates of FLASH radiotherapy appear to produce fewer toxicities than standard dose rates while maintaining local tumor control. FLASH-proton radiotherapy (F-PRT) brings the spatial advantages of PRT to FLASH dose rates (>40 Gy/second), making it important to understand if and how F-PRT spares normal tissues while providing antitumor efficacy that is equivalent to standard-proton radiotherapy (S-PRT). Here we studied PRT damage to skin and mesenchymal tissues of muscle and bone and found that F-PRT of the C57BL/6 murine hind leg produced fewer severe toxicities leading to death or requiring euthanasia than S-PRT of the same dose. RNA-seq analyses of murine skin and bone revealed pathways upregulated by S-PRT yet unaltered by F-PRT, such as apoptosis signaling and keratinocyte differentiation in skin, as well as osteoclast differentiation and chondrocyte development in bone. Corroborating these findings, F-PRT reduced skin injury, stem cell depletion, and inflammation, mitigated late effects including lymphedema, and decreased histopathologically detected myofiber atrophy, bone resorption, hair follicle atrophy, and epidermal hyperplasia. F-PRT was equipotent to S-PRT in control of two murine sarcoma models, including at an orthotopic intramuscular site, thereby establishing its relevance to mesenchymal cancers. Finally, S-PRT produced greater increases in TGFβ1 in murine skin and the skin of canines enrolled in a phase I study of F-PRT versus S-PRT. Collectively, these data provide novel insights into F-PRT-mediated tissue sparing and support its ongoing investigation in applications that would benefit from this sparing of skin and mesenchymal tissues. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings will spur investigation of FLASH radiotherapy in sarcoma and additional cancers where mesenchymal tissues are at risk, including head and neck cancer, breast cancer, and pelvic malignancies.

Citing Articles

Structural plasticity of pyramidal cell neurons measured after FLASH and conventional dose-rate irradiation.

Dickstein D, Zhang R, Ru N, Vozenin M, Perry B, Wang J Brain Struct Funct. 2025; 230(2):41.

PMID: 40024988 PMC: 11872753. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-025-02902-y.


FLASH radiation reprograms lipid metabolism and macrophage immunity and sensitizes medulloblastoma to CAR-T cell therapy.

Ni H, Reitman Z, Zou W, Akhtar M, Paul R, Huang M Nat Cancer. 2025; .

PMID: 39910249 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-025-00905-6.


Ultra‑high dose rate (FLASH) treatment: A novel radiotherapy modality (Review).

Huang J, Cheng J, Shi B, Du X, Tang S, Lin B Mol Clin Oncol. 2025; 22(3):23.

PMID: 39885864 PMC: 11775888. DOI: 10.3892/mco.2025.2818.


Exploring the Metabolic Impact of FLASH Radiotherapy.

Geirnaert F, Kerkhove L, Montay-Gruel P, Gevaert T, Dufait I, De Ridder M Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(1.

PMID: 39796760 PMC: 11720285. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010133.


FLASH radiotherapy: mechanisms, nanotherapeutic strategy and future development.

Wang Y, Wang H, Hu J, Chai J, Luan J, Li J Nanoscale Adv. 2025; 7(3):711-721.

PMID: 39781242 PMC: 11705069. DOI: 10.1039/d4na00753k.


References
1.
Montay-Gruel P, Acharya M, Goncalves Jorge P, Petit B, Petridis I, Fuchs P . Hypofractionated FLASH-RT as an Effective Treatment against Glioblastoma that Reduces Neurocognitive Side Effects in Mice. Clin Cancer Res. 2020; 27(3):775-784. PMC: 7854480. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0894. View

2.
Petersson K, Adrian G, Butterworth K, McMahon S . A Quantitative Analysis of the Role of Oxygen Tension in FLASH Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020; 107(3):539-547. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.02.634. View

3.
Folkert M, Timmerman R . Stereotactic ablative body radiosurgery (SABR) or Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016; 109:3-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.11.005. View

4.
Conrad C, Gilliet M . Type I IFNs at the interface between cutaneous immunity and epidermal remodeling. J Invest Dermatol. 2012; 132(7):1759-62. DOI: 10.1038/jid.2012.149. View

5.
Gross S, Gammon S, Moss B, Rauch D, Harding J, Heinecke J . Bioluminescence imaging of myeloperoxidase activity in vivo. Nat Med. 2009; 15(4):455-61. PMC: 2831476. DOI: 10.1038/nm.1886. View