» Articles » PMID: 33142807

Optimized Planning and Evaluation of Dental Implant Fatigue Testing: A Specific Software Application

Overview
Journal Biology (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Nov 4
PMID 33142807
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mechanical complications in implant-supported fixed dental prostheses are often related to implant and prosthetic design. Although the current ISO 14801 provides a framework for the evaluation of dental implant mechanical reliability, strict adherence to it may be difficult to achieve due to the large number of test specimens which it requires as well as the fact that it does not offer any probabilistic reference for determining the endurance limit. In order to address these issues, a new software program called ProFatigue is presented as a potentially powerful tool to optimize fatigue testing of implant-supported prostheses. The present work provides a brief description of some concepts such as load, fatigue and stress-number of cycles to failure curves (S-N curves), before subsequently describing the current regulatory situation. After analyzing the two most recent versions of the ISO recommendation (from 2008 and 2016), some limitations inherent to the experimental methods which they propose are highlighted. Finally, the main advantages and instructions for the correct implementation of the ProFatigue free software are given. This software will contribute to improving the performance of fatigue testing in a more accurate and optimized way, helping researchers to gain a better understanding of the behavior of dental implants in this type of mechanical test.

Citing Articles

A New Multi-Axial Functional Stress Analysis Assessing the Longevity of a Ti-6Al-4V Dental Implant Abutment Screw.

Naguib G, Abougazia A, Al-Turki L, Mously H, Hashem A, Mira A Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(11).

PMID: 39590261 PMC: 11591605. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9110689.


The Fracture Resistance Comparison between Titanium and Zirconia Implant Abutments with and without Ageing: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Chmielewski M, Dabrowski W, Ordyniec-Kwasnica I Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39329840 PMC: 11431843. DOI: 10.3390/dj12090274.


Biomechanical Fatigue Behavior of a Dental Implant Due to Chewing Forces: A Finite Element Analysis.

Martinez-Mondragon M, Urriolagoitia-Sosa G, Romero-Angeles B, Garcia-Laguna M, Laguna-Canales A, Perez-Partida J Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(7).

PMID: 38612181 PMC: 11012472. DOI: 10.3390/ma17071669.


Influence of Narrow Titanium Dental Implant Diameter on Fatigue Behavior: A Comparison between Unitary and Splinted Implants.

Gonzalez Terrats R, Linares M, Punset M, Molmeneu M, Nart Molina J, Ruiz Magaz V J Clin Med. 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38541858 PMC: 10971635. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061632.


Does the index in Morse taper connection affect the abutment stability? An in vitro experimental study.

Goyeneche V, Cortellari G, Rodriguez F, De Aza P, da Costa E, Scarano A PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0298462.

PMID: 38457413 PMC: 10923422. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298462.


References
1.
Park J, Baek C, Heo S, Kim S, Koak J, Kim S . An In Vitro Evaluation of the Loosening of Different Interchangeable Abutments in Internal-Connection-Type Implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017; 32(2):350-355. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.5295. View

2.
Joda T, Voumard B, Zysset P, Bragger U, Ferrari M . Ultimate force and stiffness of 2-piece zirconium dioxide implants with screw-retained monolithic lithium-disilicate reconstructions. J Prosthodont Res. 2017; 62(2):258-263. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.11.002. View

3.
Pascual F, Przybilla C, Gracia-Villa L, Puertolas J, Fernandez-Canteli A . Probabilistic assessment of fatigue initiation data on highly crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylenes. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012; 15:190-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.06.004. View

4.
Hu M, Lin H, Zhang Y, Han J . Comparison of technical, biological, and esthetic parameters of ceramic and metal-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 124(1):26-35.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.008. View

5.
Chang Y, Tambe A, Maeda Y, Wada M, Gonda T . Finite element analysis of dental implants with validation: to what extent can we expect the model to predict biological phenomena? A literature review and proposal for classification of a validation process. Int J Implant Dent. 2018; 4(1):7. PMC: 5842167. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-018-0119-5. View