» Articles » PMID: 28291853

An In Vitro Evaluation of the Loosening of Different Interchangeable Abutments in Internal-Connection-Type Implants

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2017 Mar 15
PMID 28291853
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the loosening of interchangeable one-piece abutments connected to internal-connection-type implants after cyclic loading.

Materials And Methods: Four implant abutment groups (n = 7 in each group) with Straumann tissue-level implants were assessed: Straumann solid abutment (group S), Southern Implants solid abutment (group SI), Implant Direct straight abutment (group ID), and Blue Sky Bio regular platform abutment (group BSB). The implant was firmly held in a special jig to ensure fixation. Abutment screws were tightened to manufacturers' recommended torque with a digital torque gauge. The hemispherical loading members were fabricated for the load cell of a universal testing machine to evenly distribute the force on the specimens and to fulfill the ISO 14801:2007 standard. A cyclic loading of 25 N at 30 degrees to the implant's long axis was applied for a duty of a half million cycles. Tightening torques were measured prior to the loading. Removal torques were measured after cyclic loading. The data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the significance level was set at P < .05.

Results: The mean removal torques after cyclic loading were 34.0 ± 1.1 Ncm (group S), 25.0 ± 1.5 Ncm (group SI), 23.9 ± 2.1 Ncm (group ID), and 27.9 ± 1.3 Ncm (group BSB). Removal torques of each group were statistically different in the order of group S > group BSB > groups SI and ID (P < .05). The mean reduction rates were -2.9% ± 3.2% (group S), -21.9% ± 4.8% (group SI), -20.2% ± 7.2% (group ID), and -6.9% ± 4.3% (group BSB) after a half million cycles, respectively. Reduction rates of groups S and BSB were statistically lower than those of groups SI and ID (P < .01). The standard deviation of group S was lower than group BSB.

Conclusion: The removal torque of the original Straumann abutment was significantly higher than those of the copy abutments. The reduction rate of the groups S and BSB abutments was lower than those of the other copy abutments.

Citing Articles

Comparison of De-Torque and Failure Load Evaluation of Selective-Laser-Sintered CoCr, CAD-CAM ZrO, and Machined Implant Abutment/Restoration.

Vohra F, Alsaif R, Khan R, Bukhari I Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(5).

PMID: 38790315 PMC: 11118100. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11050448.


Finite Element Analysis and Fatigue Test of INTEGRA Dental Implant System.

Zielinski R, Lipa S, Piechaczek M, Sowinski J, Kolkowska A, Simka W Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(5).

PMID: 38473684 PMC: 10934518. DOI: 10.3390/ma17051213.


A prospective multicenter clinical study on the efficiency of detachable ball- and spring-retained implant prosthesis.

Kim M, Cho W, Hwang S, Bae J, Bae E, Shim J J Adv Prosthodont. 2023; 15(4):202-213.

PMID: 37662852 PMC: 10471505. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2023.15.4.202.


Influence of the Peek Abutments on Mechanical Behavior of the Internal Connections Single Implant.

de Matos J, da Rocha Scalzer Lopes G, Queiroz D, Pereira A, Sinhoreti M, Ramos N Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(22).

PMID: 36431619 PMC: 9696524. DOI: 10.3390/ma15228133.


A comparative biomechanical study of original and compatible titanium bases: evaluation of screw loosening and 3D-crown displacement following cyclic loading analysis.

Oziunas R, Sakalauskiene J, Jegelevicius D, Januzis G J Adv Prosthodont. 2022; 14(2):70-77.

PMID: 35601348 PMC: 9095448. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.70.