» Articles » PMID: 32660541

The ARRIVE Guidelines 2.0: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research

Abstract

Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved. Here, we introduce ARRIVE 2.0. The guidelines have been updated and information reorganised to facilitate their use in practice. We used a Delphi exercise to prioritise and divide the items of the guidelines into 2 sets, the "ARRIVE Essential 10," which constitutes the minimum requirement, and the "Recommended Set," which describes the research context. This division facilitates improved reporting of animal research by supporting a stepwise approach to implementation. This helps journal editors and reviewers verify that the most important items are being reported in manuscripts. We have also developed the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration document, which serves (1) to explain the rationale behind each item in the guidelines, (2) to clarify key concepts, and (3) to provide illustrative examples. We aim, through these changes, to help ensure that researchers, reviewers, and journal editors are better equipped to improve the rigour and transparency of the scientific process and thus reproducibility.

Citing Articles

Bicomponent nano- and microfiber aerogels for effective management of junctional hemorrhage.

Shahriar S, Andrabi S, Al-Gahmi A, Yan Z, McCarthy A, Wang C Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2403.

PMID: 40064972 PMC: 11893793. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57836-0.


Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of endotracheal versus supraglottic airway epinephrine in a healthy neonatal piglet model.

Ramsie M, Cheung P, Lee T, OReilly M, Schmolzer G Pediatr Res. 2025; .

PMID: 40038459 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-025-03960-y.


Pharmacokinetics of Snake Antivenom Following Intravenous and Intramuscular Administration in Envenomed Large Animal Model.

Gamulin E, Mateljak Lukacevic S, Balija M, Smajlovic A, Vnuk D, Gulan Harcet J Pharmaceutics. 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 40006579 PMC: 11859798. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17020212.


Motor and Non-Motor Effects of Acute MPTP in Adult Zebrafish: Insights into Parkinson's Disease.

Tagkalidou N, Stevanovic M, Romero-Alfano I, Elizalde-Velazquez G, Herrera-Vazquez S, Prats E Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(4).

PMID: 40004138 PMC: 11855887. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26041674.


Effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on ulcerative colitis model in rats: The gut-brain axis.

Morshedbak M, Rahimi K, Tabandeh M Heliyon. 2025; 11(3):e42430.

PMID: 39995913 PMC: 11848074. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42430.


References
1.
Han S, Olonisakin T, Pribis J, Zupetic J, Yoon J, Holleran K . A checklist is associated with increased quality of reporting preclinical biomedical research: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2017; 12(9):e0183591. PMC: 5597130. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183591. View

2.
Kidwell M, Lazarevic L, Baranski E, Hardwicke T, Piechowski S, Falkenberg L . Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency. PLoS Biol. 2016; 14(5):e1002456. PMC: 4865119. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456. View

3.
Kilkenny C, Browne W, Cuthi I, Emerson M, Altman D . Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. Vet Clin Pathol. 2012; 41(1):27-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2012.00418.x. View

4.
Macleod M, Fisher M, OCollins V, Sena E, Dirnagl U, Bath P . Good laboratory practice: preventing introduction of bias at the bench. Stroke. 2008; 40(3):e50-2. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.525386. View

5.
. Enhancing reproducibility. Nat Methods. 2013; 10(5):367. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2471. View