» Articles » PMID: 32580087

The Role of Speaker Eye Gaze and Mutual Exclusivity in Novel Word Learning by Monolingual and Bilingual Children

Overview
Specialties Pediatrics
Psychology
Date 2020 Jun 25
PMID 32580087
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The current study examined the combined effect of a speaker's eye gaze and mutual exclusivity (ME) on novel word retention in monolingual and bilingual children. A novel object was presented with a familiar object, and children were taught new labels for objects under two conditions. In the Align condition, the speaker's gaze and the ME cue provided the same information (the speaker looked at the novel object while labeling it with a novel name). In the Conflict condition, the speaker's gaze and the ME cue provided competing information (the speaker looked at the familiar object while labeling it with a novel name). Using a visual world eye-tracking paradigm, children's retention was assessed by testing novel objects with novel labels and by testing the familiar objects with novel labels. We found that all children successfully retained the novel labels for novel objects when both eye gaze and ME provided the same information. However, when the cues conflicted, bilingual children did not perform above chance for either novel objects or familiar objects. In contrast, monolingual children demonstrated retention of novel labels for familiar objects but not for novel objects. Together, the findings suggest that redundant cues benefit word retention in all children regardless of linguistic background. Furthermore, when speaker gaze and ME conflict, bilingual children appear to disregard both cues during retention, whereas monolingual children may be more willing to retain novel labels for familiar words, suggesting that they prioritize a speaker's eye gaze over ME.

Citing Articles

Acoustic Exaggeration Enhances Speech Discrimination in Young Autistic Children.

Yu L, Ban L, Yi A, Xin J, Li S, Wang S Autism Res. 2024; 18(2):402-414.

PMID: 39731320 PMC: 11826027. DOI: 10.1002/aur.3301.


Word learning in monolingual and bilingual children: The influence of speaker eye-gaze.

Gangopadhyay I, Kaushanskaya M Biling (Camb Engl). 2024; 24(2):333-343.

PMID: 38873085 PMC: 11175166. DOI: 10.1017/s1366728920000565.


The effect of speaker reliability on word learning in monolingual and bilingual children.

Gangopadhyay I, Kaushanskaya M Cogn Dev. 2024; 64.

PMID: 38872995 PMC: 11174794. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101252.


The effects of bilingualism on children's cross-situational word learning under different variability conditions.

Crespo K, Vlach H, Kaushanskaya M J Exp Child Psychol. 2023; 229:105621.

PMID: 36689904 PMC: 10088528. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105621.


How young children integrate information sources to infer the meaning of words.

Bohn M, Tessler M, Merrick M, Frank M Nat Hum Behav. 2021; 5(8):1046-1054.

PMID: 34211148 PMC: 8373611. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01145-1.

References
1.
Davidson D, Tell D . Monolingual and bilingual children's use of mutual exclusivity in the naming of whole objects. J Exp Child Psychol. 2005; 92(1):25-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.03.007. View

2.
Grassmann S, Tomasello M . Young children follow pointing over words in interpreting acts of reference. Dev Sci. 2010; 13(1):252-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00871.x. View

3.
Fan S, Liberman Z, Keysar B, Kinzler K . The Exposure Advantage: Early Exposure to a Multilingual Environment Promotes Effective Communication. Psychol Sci. 2015; 26(7):1090-7. PMC: 4791950. DOI: 10.1177/0956797615574699. View

4.
Barr D, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily H . Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. J Mem Lang. 2014; 68(3). PMC: 3881361. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001. View

5.
Marian V, Blumenfeld H, Kaushanskaya M . The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007; 50(4):940-67. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067). View