The Effects of Bilingualism on Children's Cross-situational Word Learning Under Different Variability Conditions

Overview

Journal J Exp Child Psychol

Specialties Pediatrics
Psychology

Date 2023 Jan 23

PMID 36689904

Authors

Kimberly Crespo

Haley Vlach

Margarita Kaushanskaya

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In the current study, we examined the separate and combined effects of exemplar and speaker variability on monolingual and bilingual children's cross-situational word learning performance. Results revealed that children's word learning performance did not differ when the input varied in a single dimension (i.e., exemplars or speakers) compared with a condition with no variability independent of their linguistic background. However, when performance in conditions that varied in a single dimension (i.e., exemplars or speakers) was compared with a condition that varied in multiple dimensions (i.e., exemplars and speakers), bilingual word learning advantages were observed; bilinguals were more likely to learn word-referent associations than monolinguals. Together, results suggest that children can learn and generalize word-referent associations from input that varies in exemplars and speakers and that bilingualism may bolster learning under conditions of increased input variability.

Citing Articles

Memory representations are flexibly adapted to orthographic systems: A comparison of English and Hebrew.

Isbilen E, Laver A, Siegelman N, Aslin R Brain Res. 2024; 1844:149127.

PMID: 39033951 PMC: 11411488. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149127.

What have we learned from 15 years of research on cross-situational word learning? A focused review.

Roembke T, Simonetti M, Koch I, Philipp A Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1175272.

PMID: 37546430 PMC: 10400455. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1175272.

References

Yoshida H, Tran D, Benitez V, Kuwabara M . Inhibition and adjective learning in bilingual and monolingual children. Front Psychol. 2011; 2:210. PMC: 3172728. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00210. View

Bent T, Holt R . The influence of talker and foreign-accent variability on spoken word identification. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013; 133(3):1677-86. PMC: 3606229. DOI: 10.1121/1.4776212. View

Kovacs A, Mehler J . Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(16):6556-60. PMC: 2672482. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811323106. View

Gangopadhyay I, Kaushanskaya M . The role of speaker eye gaze and mutual exclusivity in novel word learning by monolingual and bilingual children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2020; 197:104878. PMC: 9161706. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104878. View

Magnuson J, Nusbaum H . Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007; 33(2):391-409. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.391. View

Alt M, Arizmendi G, Gray S, Hogan T, Green S, Cowan N . Novel Word Learning in Children Who Are Bilingual: Comparison to Monolingual Peers. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019; 62(7):2332-2360. PMC: 6808359. DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0009. View

Suanda S, Mugwanya N, Namy L . Cross-situational statistical word learning in young children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2014; 126:395-411. PMC: 4116143. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.06.003. View

Choi J, Perrachione T . Time and information in perceptual adaptation to speech. Cognition. 2019; 192:103982. PMC: 6732236. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.019. View

Brauer M, Curtin J . Linear mixed-effects models and the analysis of nonindependent data: A unified framework to analyze categorical and continuous independent variables that vary within-subjects and/or within-items. Psychol Methods. 2017; 23(3):389-411. DOI: 10.1037/met0000159. View

10.

Fecher N, Johnson E . Revisiting the talker recognition advantage in bilingual infants. J Exp Child Psychol. 2021; 214:105276. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105276. View

11.

Kaushanskaya M, Gross M, Buac M . Effects of classroom bilingualism on task-shifting, verbal memory, and word learning in children. Dev Sci. 2014; 17(4):564-83. PMC: 4224028. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12142. View

12.

Chen C, Gershkoff-Stowe L, Wu C, Cheung H, Yu C . Tracking Multiple Statistics: Simultaneous Learning of Object Names and Categories in English and Mandarin Speakers. Cogn Sci. 2016; 41(6):1485-1509. PMC: 5366274. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12417. View

13.

Hoff E . Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: implications for closing achievement gaps. Dev Psychol. 2012; 49(1):4-14. PMC: 4061698. DOI: 10.1037/a0027238. View

14.

Wiener S, Lee C . Multi-Talker Speech Promotes Greater Knowledge-Based Spoken Mandarin Word Recognition in First and Second Language Listeners. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:214. PMC: 7052525. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00214. View

15.

Gupta P, Lipinski J, Abbs B, Lin P, Aktunc E, Ludden D . Space aliens and nonwords: stimuli for investigating the learning of novel word-meaning pairs. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2005; 36(4):599-603. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206540. View

16.

Zettersten M, Wojcik E, Benitez V, Saffran J . The company objects keep: Linking referents together during cross-situational word learning. J Mem Lang. 2018; 99:62-73. PMC: 5828251. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.11.001. View

17.

Brojde C, Ahmed S, Colunga E . Bilingual and monolingual children attend to different cues when learning new words. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:155. PMC: 3360464. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00155. View

18.

Richtsmeier P, Gerken L, Goffman L, Hogan T . Statistical frequency in perception affects children's lexical production. Cognition. 2009; 111(3):372-7. PMC: 2719879. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.009. View

19.

Apfelbaum K, McMurray B . Using variability to guide dimensional weighting: associative mechanisms in early word learning. Cogn Sci. 2011; 35(6):1105-38. PMC: 3601333. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01181.x. View

20.

Namy L, Gentner D . Making a silk purse out of two sow's ears: young children's use of comparison in category learning. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002; 131(1):5-15. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.131.1.5. View