» Articles » PMID: 32275751

A Next-Generation Risk Assessment Case Study for Coumarin in Cosmetic Products

Abstract

Next-Generation Risk Assessment is defined as an exposure-led, hypothesis-driven risk assessment approach that integrates new approach methodologies (NAMs) to assure safety without the use of animal testing. These principles were applied to a hypothetical safety assessment of 0.1% coumarin in face cream and body lotion. For the purpose of evaluating the use of NAMs, existing animal and human data on coumarin were excluded. Internal concentrations (plasma Cmax) were estimated using a physiologically based kinetic model for dermally applied coumarin. Systemic toxicity was assessed using a battery of in vitro NAMs to identify points of departure (PoDs) for a variety of biological effects such as receptor-mediated and immunomodulatory effects (Eurofins SafetyScreen44 and BioMap Diversity 8 Panel, respectively), and general bioactivity (ToxCast data, an in vitro cell stress panel and high-throughput transcriptomics). In addition, in silico alerts for genotoxicity were followed up with the ToxTracker tool. The PoDs from the in vitro assays were plotted against the calculated in vivo exposure to calculate a margin of safety with associated uncertainty. The predicted Cmax values for face cream and body lotion were lower than all PoDs with margin of safety higher than 100. Furthermore, coumarin was not genotoxic, did not bind to any of the 44 receptors tested and did not show any immunomodulatory effects at consumer-relevant exposures. In conclusion, this case study demonstrated the value of integrating exposure science, computational modeling and in vitro bioactivity data, to reach a safety decision without animal data.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of a non-animal toolbox informed by adverse outcome pathways for human inhalation safety.

de Avila R, Muller I, Barlow H, Middleton A, Theiventhran M, Basili D Front Toxicol. 2025; 7:1426132.

PMID: 40061084 PMC: 11885506. DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2025.1426132.


Advancing systemic toxicity risk assessment: Evaluation of a NAM-based toolbox approach.

Cable S, Baltazar M, Bunglawala F, Carmichael P, Contreas L, Dent M Toxicol Sci. 2024; 204(1):79-95.

PMID: 39693112 PMC: 11879040. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae159.


Development and validation of PBPK models for genistein and daidzein for use in a next-generation risk assessment.

Najjar A, Lange D, Genies C, Kuehnl J, Zifle A, Jacques C Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1421650.

PMID: 39421667 PMC: 11483610. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1421650.


TIRESIA and TISBE: Explainable Artificial Intelligence Based Web Platforms for the Transparent Assessment of the Developmental Toxicity of Chemicals and Drugs.

Togo M, Mastrolorito F, Gambacorta N, Trisciuzzi D, Tondo A, Cutropia F Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2834:373-391.

PMID: 39312175 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4003-6_18.


Toxicity by descent: A comparative approach for chemical hazard assessment.

Colbourne J, Shaw J, Sostare E, Rivetti C, Derelle R, Barnett R Environ Adv. 2024; 9:100287.

PMID: 39228468 PMC: 11370884. DOI: 10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100287.


References
1.
Kramer N, Krismartina M, Rico-Rico A, Blaauboer B, Hermens J . Quantifying processes determining the free concentration of phenanthrene in Basal cytotoxicity assays. Chem Res Toxicol. 2012; 25(2):436-45. DOI: 10.1021/tx200479k. View

2.
Filer D, Kothiya P, Setzer R, Judson R, Martin M . tcpl: the ToxCast pipeline for high-throughput screening data. Bioinformatics. 2016; 33(4):618-620. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw680. View

3.
Schurch N, Schofield P, Gierlinski M, Cole C, Sherstnev A, Singh V . How many biological replicates are needed in an RNA-seq experiment and which differential expression tool should you use?. RNA. 2016; 22(6):839-51. PMC: 4878611. DOI: 10.1261/rna.053959.115. View

4.
Adeleye Y, Andersen M, Clewell R, Davies M, Dent M, Edwards S . Implementing Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century (TT21C): Making safety decisions using toxicity pathways, and progress in a prototype risk assessment. Toxicology. 2014; 332:102-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2014.02.007. View

5.
Armitage J, Wania F, Arnot J . Application of mass balance models and the chemical activity concept to facilitate the use of in vitro toxicity data for risk assessment. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(16):9770-9. DOI: 10.1021/es501955g. View