Physical Activity and Risks of Breast and Colorectal Cancer: a Mendelian Randomisation Analysis

Physical activity has been associated with lower risks of breast and colorectal cancer in epidemiological studies; however, it is unknown if these associations are causal or confounded. In two-sample Mendelian randomisation analyses, using summary genetic data from the UK Biobank and GWA consortia, we found that a one standard deviation increment in average acceleration was associated with lower risks of breast cancer (odds ratio [OR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27 to 0.98, P-value = 0.04) and colorectal cancer (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.90, P-value = 0.01). We found similar magnitude inverse associations for estrogen positive (ER) breast cancer and for colon cancer. Our results support a potentially causal relationship between higher physical activity levels and lower risks of breast cancer and colorectal cancer. Based on these data, the promotion of physical activity is probably an effective strategy in the primary prevention of these commonly diagnosed cancers.

Citing Articles

Causal association between blood metabolites and head and neck cancer: butyrylcarnitine identified as an associated trait for cancer risk and progression.

Li Y, Chen Z, Huang Z, Wang J, Wang J, Lin L Hereditas. 2025; 162(1):36.

PMID: 40087718 DOI: 10.1186/s41065-025-00408-5.

Unveiling circulating targets in pancreatic cancer: Insights from proteogenomic evidence and clinical cohorts.

Feng H, Chen Z, Li J, Feng J, Yang F, Meng F iScience. 2025; 28(3):111693.

PMID: 40060891 PMC: 11889678. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111693.

Mendelian randomisation to uncover causal associations between conformation, metabolism, and production as potential exposure to reproduction in German Holstein dairy cattle.

Schwarz L, Heise J, Liu Z, Bennewitz J, Thaller G, Tetens J Genet Sel Evol. 2025; 57(1):7.

PMID: 40000939 PMC: 11863791. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-025-00950-w.

Chronic pharyngitis and cervical spondylosis risk: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.

Li Y, Li X, Yu X, Xu Y, Su Y, Guo L Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 104(8):e41678.

PMID: 39993108 PMC: 11856965. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041678.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease as a mediator of urolithiasis risk: evidence from cross-sectional and genetic studies.

Miao L, Wang W, Xu J, Zhong M, Gong Y, Li C Int J Med Sci. 2025; 22(4):764-774.

PMID: 39991773 PMC: 11843138. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.106824.

References

Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock P, Burgess S . Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genet Epidemiol. 2016; 40(4):304-14. PMC: 4849733. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21965. View

Pollak M . Insulin and insulin-like growth factor signalling in neoplasia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008; 8(12):915-28. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2536. View

Hemani G, Zheng J, Elsworth B, Wade K, Haberland V, Baird D . The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. Elife. 2018; 7. PMC: 5976434. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.34408. View

Helmink B, Khan M, Hermann A, Gopalakrishnan V, Wargo J . The microbiome, cancer, and cancer therapy. Nat Med. 2019; 25(3):377-388. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0377-7. View

Friedenreich C, Neilson H, Lynch B . State of the epidemiological evidence on physical activity and cancer prevention. Eur J Cancer. 2010; 46(14):2593-604. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.07.028. View

Burgess S, Thompson S . Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects. Am J Epidemiol. 2015; 181(4):251-60. PMC: 4325677. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwu283. View

Moore S, Lee I, Weiderpass E, Campbell P, Sampson J, Kitahara C . Association of Leisure-Time Physical Activity With Risk of 26 Types of Cancer in 1.44 Million Adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176(6):816-25. PMC: 5812009. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1548. View

Shu X, Wu L, Khankari N, Shu X, Wang T, Michailidou K . Associations of obesity and circulating insulin and glucose with breast cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2018; 48(3):795-806. PMC: 6734940. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyy201. View

Ballard-Barbash R, Hunsberger S, Alciati M, Blair S, Goodwin P, McTiernan A . Physical activity, weight control, and breast cancer risk and survival: clinical trial rationale and design considerations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101(9):630-43. PMC: 2677576. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp068. View

10.

Kyu H, Bachman V, Alexander L, Mumford J, Afshin A, Estep K . Physical activity and risk of breast cancer, colon cancer, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and ischemic stroke events: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. BMJ. 2016; 354:i3857. PMC: 4979358. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i3857. View

11.

Locke A, Kahali B, Berndt S, Justice A, Pers T, Day F . Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature. 2015; 518(7538):197-206. PMC: 4382211. DOI: 10.1038/nature14177. View

12.

Murphy N, Cross A, Abubakar M, Jenab M, Aleksandrova K, Boutron-Ruault M . A Nested Case-Control Study of Metabolically Defined Body Size Phenotypes and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). PLoS Med. 2016; 13(4):e1001988. PMC: 4821615. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001988. View

13.

Bowden J, Del Greco M F, Minelli C, Davey Smith G, Sheehan N, Thompson J . A framework for the investigation of pleiotropy in two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization. Stat Med. 2017; 36(11):1783-1802. PMC: 5434863. DOI: 10.1002/sim.7221. View

14.

Prince S, Adamo K, Hamel M, Hardt J, Connor Gorber S, Tremblay M . A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5:56. PMC: 2588639. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-56. View

15.

Liedtke S, Schmidt M, Becker S, Kaaks R, Zaineddin A, Buck K . Physical activity and endogenous sex hormones in postmenopausal women: to what extent are observed associations confounded or modified by BMI?. Cancer Causes Control. 2010; 22(1):81-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-010-9677-4. View

16.

Shim H, Chasman D, Smith J, Mora S, Ridker P, Nickerson D . A multivariate genome-wide association analysis of 10 LDL subfractions, and their response to statin treatment, in 1868 Caucasians. PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0120758. PMC: 4405269. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120758. View

17.

Michailidou K, Hall P, Gonzalez-Neira A, Ghoussaini M, Dennis J, Milne R . Large-scale genotyping identifies 41 new loci associated with breast cancer risk. Nat Genet. 2013; 45(4):353-61, 361e1-2. PMC: 3771688. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2563. View

18.

Burgess S, Thompson S . Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017; 32(5):377-389. PMC: 5506233. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-017-0255-x. View

19.

Bowers L, Rossi E, OFlanagan C, DeGraffenried L, Hursting S . The Role of the Insulin/IGF System in Cancer: Lessons Learned from Clinical Trials and the Energy Balance-Cancer Link. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2015; 6:77. PMC: 4432799. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2015.00077. View

20.

Doherty A, Smith-Byrne K, Ferreira T, Holmes M, Holmes C, Pulit S . GWAS identifies 14 loci for device-measured physical activity and sleep duration. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):5257. PMC: 6288145. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07743-4. View