» Articles » PMID: 31537406

Interim Results from the IMPACT Study: Evidence for Prostate-specific Antigen Screening in BRCA2 Mutation Carriers

Overview
Journal Eur Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2019 Sep 21
PMID 31537406
Citations 81
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Mutations in BRCA2 cause a higher risk of early-onset aggressive prostate cancer (PrCa). The IMPACT study is evaluating targeted PrCa screening using prostate-specific-antigen (PSA) in men with germline BRCA1/2 mutations.

Objective: To report the utility of PSA screening, PrCa incidence, positive predictive value of PSA, biopsy, and tumour characteristics after 3 yr of screening, by BRCA status.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Men aged 40-69 yr with a germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutation and male controls testing negative for a familial BRCA1/2 mutation were recruited. Participants underwent PSA screening for 3 yr, and if PSA > 3.0 ng/ml, men were offered prostate biopsy.

Outcome Measurements And Statistical Analysis: PSA levels, PrCa incidence, and tumour characteristics were evaluated. Statistical analyses included Poisson regression offset by person-year follow-up, chi-square tests for proportion t tests for means, and Kruskal-Wallis for medians.

Results And Limitations: A total of 3027 patients (2932 unique individuals) were recruited (919 BRCA1 carriers, 709 BRCA1 noncarriers, 902 BRCA2 carriers, and 497 BRCA2 noncarriers). After 3 yr of screening, 527 men had PSA > 3.0 ng/ml, 357 biopsies were performed, and 112 PrCa cases were diagnosed (31 BRCA1 carriers, 19 BRCA1 noncarriers, 47 BRCA2 carriers, and 15 BRCA2 noncarriers). Higher compliance with biopsy was observed in BRCA2 carriers compared with noncarriers (73% vs 60%). Cancer incidence rate per 1000 person years was higher in BRCA2 carriers than in noncarriers (19.4 vs 12.0; p =  0.03); BRCA2 carriers were diagnosed at a younger age (61 vs 64 yr; p =  0.04) and were more likely to have clinically significant disease than BRCA2 noncarriers (77% vs 40%; p =  0.01). No differences in age or tumour characteristics were detected between BRCA1 carriers and BRCA1 noncarriers. The 4 kallikrein marker model discriminated better (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73) for clinically significant cancer at biopsy than PSA alone (AUC = 0.65).

Conclusions: After 3 yr of screening, compared with noncarriers, BRCA2 mutation carriers were associated with a higher incidence of PrCa, younger age of diagnosis, and clinically significant tumours. Therefore, systematic PSA screening is indicated for men with a BRCA2 mutation. Further follow-up is required to assess the role of screening in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Patient Summary: We demonstrate that after 3 yr of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, we detect more serious prostate cancers in men with BRCA2 mutations than in those without these mutations. We recommend that male BRCA2 carriers are offered systematic PSA screening.

Citing Articles

Impact of prostate cancer screening in European ancestry un-affected men with germline DNA repair pathogenic variants.

Fasulo V, Chiarelli G, Garofano G, Ripamonti C, Barile M, Bianchi P BJUI Compass. 2025; 6(3).

PMID: 40066468 PMC: 11891281. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.424.


Early Detection of the Pathogenetic Variants of Homologous Recombination Repair Genes in Prostate Cancer: Critical Analysis and Experimental Design.

Bottillo I, Sciarra A, Bevilacqua G, Gentilucci A, Sciarra B, Santarelli V Biology (Basel). 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 40001885 PMC: 11851859. DOI: 10.3390/biology14020117.


Causative Genes of Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD)-Related Breast Cancer and Specific Strategies at Present.

Nakamura S, Kojima Y, Takeuchi S Curr Oncol. 2025; 32(2).

PMID: 39996890 PMC: 11854191. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol32020090.


Screening for prostate cancer: evidence, ongoing trials, policies and knowledge gaps.

Bratt O, Auvinen A, Arnsrud Godtman R, Hellstrom M, Hugosson J, Lilja H BMJ Oncol. 2025; 2(1):e000039.

PMID: 39886507 PMC: 11203092. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000039.


Prostate-specific antigen screening at low thresholds of men with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants.

Stroomberg H, Brasso K, Blak A, Byrjalsen A, Hansen T, Roder A Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025; .

PMID: 39838196 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-025-00938-z.


References
1.
Verbeek J, Bangma C, Kweldam C, van der Kwast T, Kummerlin I, van Leenders G . Reducing unnecessary biopsies while detecting clinically significant prostate cancer including cribriform growth with the ERSPC Rotterdam risk calculator and 4Kscore. Urol Oncol. 2018; 37(2):138-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.11.021. View

2.
Bancroft E, Page E, Castro E, Lilja H, Vickers A, Sjoberg D . Targeted prostate cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from the initial screening round of the IMPACT study. Eur Urol. 2014; 66(3):489-99. PMC: 4105321. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.003. View

3.
Mitra A, Bancroft E, Eeles R . A review of targeted screening for prostate cancer: introducing the IMPACT study. BJU Int. 2007; 99(6):1350-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06759.x. View

4.
Poyet C, Nieboer D, Bhindi B, Kulkarni G, Wiederkehr C, Wettstein M . Prostate cancer risk prediction using the novel versions of the European Randomised Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) risk calculators: independent validation and comparison in a contemporary.... BJU Int. 2015; 117(3):401-8. DOI: 10.1111/bju.13314. View

5.
Mitra A, Fisher C, Foster C, Jameson C, Barbachanno Y, Bartlett J . Prostate cancer in male BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers has a more aggressive phenotype. Br J Cancer. 2008; 98(2):502-7. PMC: 2361443. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604132. View