» Articles » PMID: 25108889

Screening and Prostate Cancer Mortality: Results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 Years of Follow-up

Abstract

Background: The European Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) has shown significant reductions in prostate cancer mortality after 9 years and 11 years of follow-up, but screening is controversial because of adverse events such as overdiagnosis. We provide updated results of mortality from prostate cancer with follow-up to 2010, with analyses truncated at 9, 11, and 13 years.

Methods: ERSPC is a multicentre, randomised trial with a predefined centralised database, analysis plan, and core age group (55-69 years), which assesses prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in eight European countries. Eligible men aged 50-74 years were identified from population registries and randomly assigned by computer generated random numbers to screening or no intervention (control). Investigators were masked to group allocation. The primary outcome was prostate cancer mortality in the core age group. Analysis was by intention to treat. We did a secondary analysis that corrected for selection bias due to non-participation. Only incidence and no mortality data at 9 years' follow-up are reported for the French centres. This study is registered with Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN49127736.

Findings: With data truncated at 13 years of follow-up, 7408 prostate cancer cases were diagnosed in the intervention group and 6107 cases in the control group. The rate ratio of prostate cancer incidence between the intervention and control groups was 1·91 (95% CI 1·83-1·99) after 9 years (1·64 [1·58-1·69] including France), 1·66 (1·60-1·73) after 11 years, and 1·57 (1·51-1·62) after 13 years. The rate ratio of prostate cancer mortality was 0·85 (0·70-1·03) after 9 years, 0·78 (0·66-0·91) after 11 years, and 0·79 (0·69-0·91) at 13 years. The absolute risk reduction of death from prostate cancer at 13 years was 0·11 per 1000 person-years or 1·28 per 1000 men randomised, which is equivalent to one prostate cancer death averted per 781 (95% CI 490-1929) men invited for screening or one per 27 (17-66) additional prostate cancer detected. After adjustment for non-participation, the rate ratio of prostate cancer mortality in men screened was 0·73 (95% CI 0·61-0·88).

Interpretation: In this update the ERSPC confirms a substantial reduction in prostate cancer mortality attributable to testing of PSA, with a substantially increased absolute effect at 13 years compared with findings after 9 and 11 years. Despite our findings, further quantification of harms and their reduction are still considered a prerequisite for the introduction of populated-based screening.

Funding: Each centre had its own funding responsibility.

Citing Articles

Cancer screening in patients with acromegaly: a plea for a personalized approach and international registries.

Demarchis L, Chiloiro S, Giampietro A, De Marinis L, Bianchi A, Fleseriu M Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2025; .

PMID: 40088375 DOI: 10.1007/s11154-025-09957-6.


Association between high‑density lipoproteins and prostate specific antigen: A cross‑sectional study from NHANES database.

Adan M, Hu B, Yan M, Hidig S, Dai Y, Li G Mol Clin Oncol. 2025; 22(4):34.

PMID: 40012901 PMC: 11863179. DOI: 10.3892/mco.2025.2829.


Impact of patients' age and comorbidities on prostate cancer overdiagnosis in clinical practice.

Beltran A, Parker L, Moral-Perez I, Caballero-Romeu J, Chilet-Rosell E, Hernandez-Aguado I PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0315979.

PMID: 39970139 PMC: 11838881. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315979.


An online clustering algorithm predicting model for prostate cancer based on PHI-related variables and PI-RADS in different PSA populations.

Hu J, Miao Q, Ren J, Su H, Zhang X, Bi J Cancer Cell Int. 2025; 25(1):44.

PMID: 39948672 PMC: 11827463. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-025-03677-2.


Screening for prostate cancer: evidence, ongoing trials, policies and knowledge gaps.

Bratt O, Auvinen A, Arnsrud Godtman R, Hellstrom M, Hugosson J, Lilja H BMJ Oncol. 2025; 2(1):e000039.

PMID: 39886507 PMC: 11203092. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000039.


References
1.
de Koning H, Liem M, Baan C, Boer R, Schroder F, Alexander F . Prostate cancer mortality reduction by screening: power and time frame with complete enrollment in the European Randomised Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial. Int J Cancer. 2002; 98(2):268-73. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.10188. View

2.
Wolters T, Roobol M, Steyerberg E, van den Bergh R, Bangma C, Hugosson J . The effect of study arm on prostate cancer treatment in the large screening trial ERSPC. Int J Cancer. 2009; 126(10):2387-93. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24870. View

3.
DeMets D, Lan K . Interim analysis: the alpha spending function approach. Stat Med. 1994; 13(13-14):1341-52; discussion 1353-6. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780131308. View

4.
de Koning H, Blom J, Merkelbach J, Raaijmakers R, Verhaegen H, van Vliet P . Determining the cause of death in randomized screening trial(s) for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2004; 92 Suppl 2:71-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-5101.2003.04402.x. View

5.
Makinen T, Karhunen P, Aro J, Lahtela J, Maattanen L, Auvinen A . Assessment of causes of death in a prostate cancer screening trial. Int J Cancer. 2007; 122(2):413-7. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23126. View