One-locus-several-primers: A Strategy to Improve the Taxonomic and Haplotypic Coverage in Diet Metabarcoding Studies
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
In diet metabarcoding analyses, insufficient taxonomic coverage of PCR primer sets generates false negatives that may dramatically distort biodiversity estimates. In this paper, we investigated the taxonomic coverage and complementarity of three cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene (COI) primer sets based on in silico analyses and we conducted an in vivo evaluation using fecal and spider web samples from different invertivores, environments, and geographic locations. Our results underline the lack of predictability of both the coverage and complementarity of individual primer sets: (a) sharp discrepancies exist observed between in silico and in vivo analyses (to the detriment of in silico analyses); (b) both coverage and complementarity depend greatly on the predator and on the taxonomic level at which preys are considered; (c) primer sets' complementarity is the greatest at fine taxonomic levels (molecular operational taxonomic units [MOTUs] and variants). We then formalized the "one-locus-several-primer-sets" (OLSP) strategy, that is, the use of several primer sets that target the same locus (here the first part of the COI gene) and the same group of taxa (here invertebrates). The proximal aim of the OLSP strategy is to minimize false negatives by increasing total coverage through multiple primer sets. We illustrate that the OLSP strategy is especially relevant from this perspective since distinct variants within the same MOTUs were not equally detected across all primer sets. Furthermore, the OLSP strategy produces largely overlapping and comparable sequences, which cannot be achieved when targeting different loci. This facilitates the use of haplotypic diversity information contained within metabarcoding datasets, for example, for phylogeography and finer analyses of prey-predator interactions.
Editorial: Challenges and prospects for conservation genetics at XXI century.
Amavet P, Fernandez G, Solis Neffa V Front Genet. 2025; 16:1554590.
PMID: 40041862 PMC: 11876150. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1554590.
Vescera C, Van Vyve C, Smits Q, Michaux J PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0302028.
PMID: 38718094 PMC: 11078406. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302028.
Spider webs capture environmental DNA from terrestrial vertebrates.
Newton J, Nevill P, Bateman P, Campbell M, Allentoft M iScience. 2024; 27(2):108904.
PMID: 38533454 PMC: 10964257. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108904.
Li L, Yin X, Wan Q, Rusitanmu D, Han J Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(2).
PMID: 38392347 PMC: 10887057. DOI: 10.3390/biology13020129.
Exploring and validating observations of non-local species in eDNA samples.
Westerduin C, Suokas M, Petaja T, Saarela U, Vainio S, Mutanen M Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(10):e10612.
PMID: 37841221 PMC: 10576249. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10612.