» Articles » PMID: 32416615

Ecosystems Monitoring Powered by Environmental Genomics: A Review of Current Strategies with an Implementation Roadmap

Abstract

A decade after environmental scientists integrated high-throughput sequencing technologies in their toolbox, the genomics-based monitoring of anthropogenic impacts on the biodiversity and functioning of ecosystems is yet to be implemented by regulatory frameworks. Despite the broadly acknowledged potential of environmental genomics to this end, technical limitations and conceptual issues still stand in the way of its broad application by end-users. In addition, the multiplicity of potential implementation strategies may contribute to a perception that the routine application of this methodology is premature or "in development", hence restraining regulators from binding these tools into legal frameworks. Here, we review recent implementations of environmental genomics-based methods, applied to the biomonitoring of ecosystems. By taking a general overview, without narrowing our perspective to particular habitats or groups of organisms, this paper aims to compare, review and discuss the strengths and limitations of four general implementation strategies of environmental genomics for monitoring: (a) Taxonomy-based analyses focused on identification of known bioindicators or described taxa; (b) De novo bioindicator analyses; (c) Structural community metrics including inferred ecological networks; and (d) Functional community metrics (metagenomics or metatranscriptomics). We emphasise the utility of the three latter strategies to integrate meiofauna and microorganisms that are not traditionally utilised in biomonitoring because of difficult taxonomic identification. Finally, we propose a roadmap for the implementation of environmental genomics into routine monitoring programmes that leverage recent analytical advancements, while pointing out current limitations and future research needs.

Citing Articles

Advancing biomonitoring of eDNA studies with the Anaconda R package: Integrating soil and One Health perspectives in the face of evolving traditional agriculture practices.

Stenger P, Leopold A, Dinh K, Mournet P, Robert N, Drouin J PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0311986.

PMID: 39821144 PMC: 11737689. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311986.


Monitoring bay-scale ecosystem changes in bivalve aquaculture embayments using flow cytometry.

Sharpe H, Guyondet T, Barrell J, Belzile C, McKindsey C, Salvo F PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0313271.

PMID: 39499719 PMC: 11537403. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313271.


Potential applications of microbial genomics in nuclear non-proliferation.

MacGregor H, Fukai I, Ash K, Arkin A, Hazen T Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1410820.

PMID: 39360321 PMC: 11445143. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1410820.


Seasonality of primary production explains the richness of pioneering benthic communities.

Cecchetto M, Dettai A, Gallut C, Obst M, Kuklinski P, Balazy P Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8340.

PMID: 39333524 PMC: 11436788. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52673-z.


Taxonomic and functional metagenomic assessment of a Dolichospermum bloom in a large and deep lake south of the Alps.

Salmaso N, Cerasino L, Pindo M, Boscaini A FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2024; 100(10).

PMID: 39227168 PMC: 11412076. DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiae117.


References
1.
Hajibabaei M, Spall J, Shokralla S, van Konynenburg S . Assessing biodiversity of a freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate community through non-destructive environmental barcoding of DNA from preservative ethanol. BMC Ecol. 2012; 12:28. PMC: 3542036. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6785-12-28. View

2.
Laroche O, Wood S, Tremblay L, Ellis J, Lear G, Pochon X . A cross-taxa study using environmental DNA/RNA metabarcoding to measure biological impacts of offshore oil and gas drilling and production operations. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018; 127:97-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.042. View

3.
Nascimento F, Lallias D, Bik H, Creer S . Sample size effects on the assessment of eukaryotic diversity and community structure in aquatic sediments using high-throughput sequencing. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):11737. PMC: 6078945. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30179-1. View

4.
Escalas A, Hale L, Voordeckers J, Yang Y, Firestone M, Alvarez-Cohen L . Microbial functional diversity: From concepts to applications. Ecol Evol. 2019; 9(20):12000-12016. PMC: 6822047. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5670. View

5.
Cordier T, Forster D, Dufresne Y, Martins C, Stoeck T, Pawlowski J . Supervised machine learning outperforms taxonomy-based environmental DNA metabarcoding applied to biomonitoring. Mol Ecol Resour. 2018; 18(6):1381-1391. DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12926. View