» Articles » PMID: 20637073

An in Silico Approach for the Evaluation of DNA Barcodes

Overview
Journal BMC Genomics
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Genetics
Date 2010 Jul 20
PMID 20637073
Citations 119
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: DNA barcoding is a key tool for assessing biodiversity in both taxonomic and environmental studies. Essential features of barcodes include their applicability to a wide spectrum of taxa and their ability to identify even closely related species. Several DNA regions have been proposed as barcodes and the region selected strongly influences the output of a study. However, formal comparisons between barcodes remained limited until now. Here we present a standard method for evaluating barcode quality, based on the use of a new bioinformatic tool that performs in silico PCR over large databases. We illustrate this approach by comparing the taxonomic coverage and the resolution of several DNA regions already proposed for the barcoding of vertebrates. To assess the relationship between in silico and in vitro PCR, we also developed specific primers amplifying different species of Felidae, and we tested them using both kinds of PCR RESULTS: Tests on specific primers confirmed the correspondence between in silico and in vitro PCR. Nevertheless, results of in silico and in vitro PCRs can be somehow different, also because tuning PCR conditions can increase the performance of primers with limited taxonomic coverage. The in silico evaluation of DNA barcodes showed a strong variation of taxonomic coverage (i.e., universality): barcodes based on highly degenerated primers and those corresponding to the conserved region of the Cyt-b showed the highest coverage. As expected, longer barcodes had a better resolution than shorter ones, which are however more convenient for ecological studies analysing environmental samples.

Conclusions: In silico PCR could be used to improve the performance of a study, by allowing the preliminary comparison of several DNA regions in order to identify the most appropriate barcode depending on the study aims.

Citing Articles

Using DNA metabarcoding and direct behavioural observations to identify the diet of proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus) in the Kinabatangan Floodplain, Sabah.

Thiry V, Boom A, Stark D, Hardy O, Beudels-Jamar R, Vercauteren Drubbel R PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0316752.

PMID: 39752478 PMC: 11698349. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316752.


Integrating DNA Barcoding Within an Orthogonal Approach for Herbal Product Authentication: A Narrative Review.

Nazar N, Saxena A, Sebastian A, Slater A, Sundaresan V, Sgamma T Phytochem Anal. 2024; 36(1):7-29.

PMID: 39532481 PMC: 11743069. DOI: 10.1002/pca.3466.


Enhancing African coelacanth monitoring using environmental DNA.

Oliver J, Shum P, Mariani S, Sink K, Palmer R, Matcher G Biol Lett. 2024; 20(10):20240415.

PMID: 39439356 PMC: 11496946. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0415.


Barcoding of Italian mosquitoes (BITMO): generation and validation of DNA barcoding reference libraries for native and alien species of Culicidae.

Bisaglia B, Castelli M, Soresinetti L, Negri A, Arnoldi I, Montarsi F Parasit Vectors. 2024; 17(1):407.

PMID: 39342262 PMC: 11439297. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-024-06478-0.


Group membership, not diet, structures the composition and functional potential of the gut microbiome in a wild primate.

Finnegan P, Garber P, McKenney A, Bicca-Marques J, De la Fuente M, Abreu F mSphere. 2024; 9(7):e0023324.

PMID: 38940510 PMC: 11288025. DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00233-24.


References
1.
Valentini A, Pompanon F, Taberlet P . DNA barcoding for ecologists. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008; 24(2):110-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.011. View

2.
Meyer R, Hofelein C, Luthy J, Candrian U . Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis: a simple method for species identification in food. J AOAC Int. 1995; 78(6):1542-51. View

3.
Hebert P, Ratnasingham S, deWaard J . Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270 Suppl 1:S96-9. PMC: 1698023. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0025. View

4.
Kocher T, Thomas W, Meyer A, Edwards S, Paabo S, Villablanca F . Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989; 86(16):6196-200. PMC: 297804. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.86.16.6196. View

5.
Willerslev E, Hansen A, Binladen J, Brand T, Gilbert M, Shapiro B . Diverse plant and animal genetic records from Holocene and Pleistocene sediments. Science. 2003; 300(5620):791-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1084114. View