» Articles » PMID: 38392347

Diet Diversity of the Fluviatile Masu Salmon, (Brevoort 1856) Revealed Via Gastrointestinal Environmental DNA Metabarcoding and Morphological Identification of Contents

Overview
Journal Biology (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Feb 23
PMID 38392347
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Masu salmon, (Brevoort 1856), a commercially important fish species endemic to the North Pacific Ocean, attained national second-level protected animal status in China in 2021. Despite this recognition, knowledge about the trophic ecology of this fish remains limited. This study investigated the diet diversity of fluviatile Masu salmon in the Mijiang River, China, utilizing the gastrointestinal tract environmental DNA (GITeDNA) metabarcoding and morphological identification. The results revealed a diverse prey composition, ranging from terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates to small fishes. The fluviatile Masu salmon in general consumed noteworthily more aquatic prey than terrestrial prey. There were much more prey taxa and a higher diet diversity detected by GITeDNA metabarcoding than by morphological identification. GITeDNA metabarcoding showed that larger and older Masu salmon consumed significantly more terrestrial insects than aquatic prey species did, with 7366 verses 5012 sequences in the group of ≥20 cm, 9098 verses 4743 sequences in the group of ≥100 g and 11,540 verses 729 sequences in the group of age 3+. GITeDNA metabarcoding also showed size- and age-related diet diversity, indicating that the dietary niche breadth and trophic diversity of larger and older Masu salmon increased with food resources expanding to more terrestrial prey. Terrestrial invertebrates of riparian habitats play a vital role in the diet of fluviatile Masu salmon, especially larger individuals, highlighting their importance in connecting aquatic and terrestrial food webs. Conservation plans should prioritize the protection and restoration of riparian habitats. This study advocates the combined use of GITeDNA metabarcoding and morphological observation for a comprehensive understanding of fish diet diversity.

References
1.
Hajibabaei M, Spall J, Shokralla S, van Konynenburg S . Assessing biodiversity of a freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate community through non-destructive environmental barcoding of DNA from preservative ethanol. BMC Ecol. 2012; 12:28. PMC: 3542036. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6785-12-28. View

2.
Roubinet E, Jonsson T, Malsher G, Staudacher K, Traugott M, Ekbom B . High Redundancy as well as Complementary Prey Choice Characterize Generalist Predator Food Webs in Agroecosystems. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):8054. PMC: 5966386. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26191-0. View

3.
Callahan B, McMurdie P, Rosen M, Han A, Johnson A, Holmes S . DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016; 13(7):581-3. PMC: 4927377. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. View

4.
Pirroni S, de Pennafort Dezen L, Santi F, Riesch R . Comparative gut content analysis of invasive mosquitofish from Italy and Spain. Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(9):4379-4398. PMC: 8093736. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7334. View

5.
Romero G, Srivastava D . Food-web composition affects cross-ecosystem interactions and subsidies. J Anim Ecol. 2010; 79(5):1122-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01716.x. View