» Articles » PMID: 30987026

Ratio Between Height and Thickness of the Buccal Tissues: A Pilot Study on 32 Single Implants

Overview
Journal Dent J (Basel)
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2019 Apr 17
PMID 30987026
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Previous studies have suggested that mucosal height is related to the bone level and soft tissue thickness. The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the ratio between the height and width of the tissues around single implants with a conical connection and platform switching.

Methods: All patients receiving single implants (Anyridge, MegaGen, Gyeongbuk, South Korea) and restored with single crowns, in a three-month period, were included in this study. After a provisionalization of 12 months, precision impressions were taken and stone casts were poured for measurements. For each implant, two values were collected at the buccal site: the mucosal height (MH), calculated from the vestibular shoulder of the implant to the upper gingival margin of the supra-implant tissue; and the mucosal thickness (MT), calculated from the vestibular shoulder of the analogue to the external mucosa point perpendicular to the implant major axis. Mean, standard deviation (SD), and confidence intervals (CI 95%) for MH and MT, as well as their ratios, were calculated. Correlation between MH and MT was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient, with significance level set at 0.05.

Results: 32 single Anyridge implants were eligible for this evaluation. The mean MH was 3.44 mm (±1.28), the mean MT was 3.29 (±1.46). The average of the ratio between MH and MT of the supra-implant mucosa was therefore 1:1.19 (±0.55). The relation between MH and MT was statistically significant at p ≤ 0.01 (Pearson two-tailed 95% CI).

Conclusions: Our study found a constant relationship between width and height of the peri-implant mucosa. However, our results are different from those of Nozawa et al., who found a ratio of 1:1.5 between height and thickness of the peri-implant tissues. This may be determined by the different sample and follow-up period, as well as by the implants used in our study.

Citing Articles

[Influence of emergence profile designs on the peri-implant tissue in the mandibular molar: A randomized controlled trial].

Wang J, Qiu L, Yu H Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025; 57(1):65-72.

PMID: 39856508 PMC: 11759793.


Influence of buccal mucosa width/height ratio, emergence profile and buccal bone width on peri-implant tissues: a prospective one-year study.

Tang Y, Wang J, Qiu L, Yu H BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):61.

PMID: 39799344 PMC: 11725196. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05426-3.


Association of Peri-Implant Mucosa Dimensions With Emergence Profile Angles of the Implant Prosthesis.

Rungtanakiat P, Thitaphanich N, Janda M, Strauss F, Arksornnukit M, Mattheos N Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024; 10(4):e939.

PMID: 39039934 PMC: 11263758. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.939.


A Novel Prehydrated Porcine-Derived Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Histological and Clinical Evaluation.

van Orten A, Goetz W, Bilhan H Int J Biomater. 2024; 2024:7322223.

PMID: 38966862 PMC: 11223909. DOI: 10.1155/2024/7322223.


Soft tissue dimensional change using customized titanium healing abutment in immediate implant placement in posterior teeth.

Lertwongpaisan T, Amornsettachai P, Panyayong W, Suphangul S BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):384.

PMID: 37308877 PMC: 10262413. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03060-5.


References
1.
Oates T, West J, Jones J, Kaiser D, Cochran D . Long-term changes in soft tissue height on the facial surface of dental implants. Implant Dent. 2002; 11(3):272-9. DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200207000-00013. View

2.
Buser D, Martin W, Belser U . Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 19 Suppl:43-61. View

3.
Araujo M, Lindhe J . Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32(2):212-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x. View

4.
Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G . Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16(6):639-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x. View

5.
Lazzara R, Porter S . Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006; 26(1):9-17. View