» Articles » PMID: 19655487

Biologic Height-width Ratio of the Buccal Supra-implant Mucosa

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2009 Aug 7
PMID 19655487
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, esthetic implant dentistry has focused on changes in buccal implant mucosal height. The purpose of this article was to investigate the relationship between the height and width of buccal supra-implant mucosa based on the physiologic mucosal form surrounding the implant. Fourteen patients who had buccal supra-implant mucosal heights of more than 1.5 mm and keratinized mucosa 1 year or more after superstructure placement (average period: 3 years 5 months) were studied. Silicone impressions were taken immediately after superstructures and abutments were removed. The study model used for the measurement process was manufactured using improved dental stone. The height and width of the buccal supra-implant mucosa were measured using digital slide calipers, and the ratio of the height and width was investigated. In all cases, the widths were greater than the heights. The average height of the buccal supra-implant mucosa was 2.17 mm, while the average width was 3.44 mm. The average biologic height-width ratio was 1:1.58. The width was larger in the posterior region than in the anterior. There were no differences in the biologic height-width ratio in terms of the diameter of the implant. These findings indicate that peri-implant soft tissue augmentation procedures resulting in an average biologic height-width ratio of 1:1.5 may provide a stable buccal cervical line around the implant superstructure, even for thin periodontal biotypes.

Citing Articles

[Influence of emergence profile designs on the peri-implant tissue in the mandibular molar: A randomized controlled trial].

Wang J, Qiu L, Yu H Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025; 57(1):65-72.

PMID: 39856508 PMC: 11759793.


Influence of buccal mucosa width/height ratio, emergence profile and buccal bone width on peri-implant tissues: a prospective one-year study.

Tang Y, Wang J, Qiu L, Yu H BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):61.

PMID: 39799344 PMC: 11725196. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05426-3.


Association of Peri-Implant Mucosa Dimensions With Emergence Profile Angles of the Implant Prosthesis.

Rungtanakiat P, Thitaphanich N, Janda M, Strauss F, Arksornnukit M, Mattheos N Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024; 10(4):e939.

PMID: 39039934 PMC: 11263758. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.939.


A Novel Prehydrated Porcine-Derived Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Histological and Clinical Evaluation.

van Orten A, Goetz W, Bilhan H Int J Biomater. 2024; 2024:7322223.

PMID: 38966862 PMC: 11223909. DOI: 10.1155/2024/7322223.


Maxillary labial peri-implant hard and soft tissue alteration observed on cross-sectional dimension: a 2-year prospective observational study.

Yamada S, Nakano T, Kobayashi T, Ishigaki S Int J Implant Dent. 2023; 9(1):16.

PMID: 37351804 PMC: 10290020. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-023-00477-z.