Outcome Evaluation of Early Placed Maxillary Anterior Single-tooth Implants Using Objective Esthetic Criteria: a Cross-sectional, Retrospective Study in 45 Patients with a 2- to 4-year Follow-up Using Pink and White Esthetic Scores
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: To validate the concept of early implant placement for use in the esthetically sensitive anterior maxilla, clinical trials should ideally include objective esthetic criteria when assessing outcome parameters.
Methods: In this cross-sectional, retrospective 2- to 4-year study involving 45 patients treated with maxillary anterior single-tooth implants according to the concept of early implant placement, a novel comprehensive index, comprising pink esthetic score and white esthetic score (PES/WES; the highest possible combined score is 20), was applied for the objective esthetic outcome assessment of anterior single-tooth implants.
Results: All 45 anterior maxillary single-tooth implants fulfilled strict success criteria for dental implants with regard to osseointegration, including the absence of peri-implant radiolucency, implant mobility, suppuration, and pain. The mean total PES/WES was 14.7 +/- 1.18 (range: 11 to 18). The mean total PES of 7.8 +/- 0.88 (range: 6 to 9) documents favorable overall peri-implant soft tissue conditions. The two PES variables facial mucosa curvature (1.9 +/- 0.29) and facial mucosa level (1.8 +/- 0.42) had the highest mean values, whereas the combination variable root convexity/soft tissue color and texture (1.2 +/- 0.53) proved to be the most difficult to fully satisfy. Mean scores were 1.6 +/- 0.5 for the mesial papilla and 1.3 +/- 0.5 for the distal papilla. A mean value of 6.9 +/- 1.47 (range: 4 to 10) was calculated for WES.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that anterior maxillary single-tooth replacement, according to the concept of early implant placement, is a successful and predictable treatment modality, in general, and from an esthetic point of view, in particular. The suitability of the PES/WES index for the objective outcome assessment of the esthetic dimension of anterior single-tooth implants was confirmed. However, prospective clinical trials are needed to further validate and refine this index.
Tuli P, Kolte A, Kolte R, Lathiya V J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2025; 28(4):407-416.
PMID: 40018714 PMC: 11864343. DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_66_24.
Bengtsson V, Lindahl C, Scholander S Acta Odontol Scand. 2025; 84:47-53.
PMID: 39835673 PMC: 11806213. DOI: 10.2340/aos.v84.42724.
Nguyen M, Nguyen H, Nguyen T, Huynh N BDJ Open. 2024; 10(1):100.
PMID: 39732724 PMC: 11682062. DOI: 10.1038/s41405-024-00292-7.
Brennand Roper M, Fields Y Br Dent J. 2024; 237(11):843-849.
PMID: 39672854 PMC: 11645261. DOI: 10.1038/s41415-024-8023-2.
Aesthetic Clinical Case for Immediate Implant Therapy for Maxillary Central Incisor.
Guzman G, Rojas-Rueda S, Floriani F, Jurado C, Apiazu-Flores F, Fischer N Case Rep Dent. 2024; 2024:4199406.
PMID: 39659912 PMC: 11631293. DOI: 10.1155/crid/4199406.