Optimisation of Ultrasound Liver Perfusion Through a Digital Reference Object and Analysis Tool

Overview

Journal Eur Radiol Exp

Date 2019 Apr 5

PMID 30945029

Authors

Angel Alberich-Bayarri

Jose Tomas-Cucarella

Alfredo Torregrosa-Lloret

Javier Saiz Rodriguez

Luis Marti-Bonmati

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Conventional ultrasound (US) provides important qualitative information, although there is a need to evaluate the influence of the input parameters on the output signal and standardise the acquisition for an adequate quantitative perfusion assessment. The present study analyses how the variation in the input parameters influences the measurement of the perfusion parameters.

Methods: A software tool with simulator of the conventional US signal was created, and the influence of the different input variables on the derived biomarkers was analysed by varying the image acquisition configuration. The input parameters considered were the dynamic range, gain, and frequency of the transducer. Their influence on mean transit time (MTT), the area under the curve (AUC), maximum intensity (MI), and time to peak (TTP) parameters as outputs of the quantitative perfusion analysis was evaluated. A group of 13 patients with hepatocarcinoma was analysed with both a commercial tool and an in-house developed software.

Results: The optimal calculated inputs which minimise errors while preserving images' readability consisted of gain of 15 dB, dynamic range of 60 dB, and frequency of 1.5 MHz. The comparison between the in-house developed software and the commercial software provided different values for MTT and AUC, while MI and TTP were highly similar.

Conclusion: Input parameter selection introduces variability and errors in US perfusion parameter estimation. Our results may add relevant insight into the current knowledge of conventional US perfusion and its use in lesions characterisation, playing in favour of optimised standardised parameter configuration to minimise variability.

References

Malm S, Frigstad S, Helland F, Oye K, Slordahl S, Skjarpe T . Quantification of resting myocardial blood flow velocity in normal humans using real-time contrast echocardiography. A feasibility study. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2005; 3:16. PMC: 1184091. DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-3-16. View

Arditi M, Frinking P, Zhou X, Rognin N . A new formalism for the quantification of tissue perfusion by the destruction-replenishment method in contrast ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2006; 53(6):1118-29. DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2006.1642510. View

Green M, Mathias C, Willis L, Handa R, Lacy J, Miller M . Assessment of Cu-ETS as a PET radiopharmaceutical for evaluation of regional renal perfusion. Nucl Med Biol. 2007; 34(3):247-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.01.002. View

Daghini E, Primak A, Chade A, Krier J, Zhu X, Ritman E . Assessment of renal hemodynamics and function in pigs with 64-section multidetector CT: comparison with electron-beam CT. Radiology. 2007; 243(2):405-12. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2432060655. View

Savic R, Jonker D, Kerbusch T, Karlsson M . Implementation of a transit compartment model for describing drug absorption in pharmacokinetic studies. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2007; 34(5):711-26. DOI: 10.1007/s10928-007-9066-0. View

Martin D, Sharma P, Salman K, Jones R, Grattan-Smith J, Mao H . Individual kidney blood flow measured with contrast-enhanced first-pass perfusion MR imaging. Radiology. 2007; 246(1):241-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2461062129. View

Shunichi S, Hiroko I, Fuminori M, Waki H . Definition of contrast enhancement phases of the liver using a perfluoro-based microbubble agent, perflubutane microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009; 35(11):1819-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.05.013. View

Averkiou M, Lampaskis M, Kyriakopoulou K, Skarlos D, Klouvas G, Strouthos C . Quantification of tumor microvascularity with respiratory gated contrast enhanced ultrasound for monitoring therapy. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009; 36(1):68-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.07.005. View

Gauthier T, Averkiou M, Leen E . Perfusion quantification using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the impact of dynamic range and gain on time-intensity curves. Ultrasonics. 2010; 51(1):102-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2010.06.004. View

10.

Quaia E . Assessment of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2010; 21(3):604-15. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1965-6. View

11.

Zhou J, Cao L, Zheng W, Liu M, Han F, Li A . Contrast-enhanced gray-scale ultrasound for quantitative evaluation of tumor response to chemotherapy: preliminary results with a mouse hepatoma model. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 196(1):W13-7. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.4734. View

12.

Kuenen M, Mischi M, Wijkstra H . Contrast-ultrasound diffusion imaging for localization of prostate cancer. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011; 30(8):1493-502. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2125981. View

13.

Brands J, Vink H, van Teeffelen J . Comparison of four mathematical models to analyze indicator-dilution curves in the coronary circulation. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011; 49(12):1471-9. PMC: 3223587. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-011-0845-9. View

14.

Tang M, Mulvana H, Gauthier T, Lim A, Cosgrove D, Eckersley R . Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: a review of sources of variability. Interface Focus. 2012; 1(4):520-39. PMC: 3262271. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2011.0026. View

15.

Parker J, Weller M, Feinstein L, Adams R, Main M, Grayburn P . Safety of ultrasound contrast agents in patients with known or suspected cardiac shunts. Am J Cardiol. 2013; 112(7):1039-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.042. View

16.

Garcia D, LE Tarnec L, Muth S, Montagnon E, Poree J, Cloutier G . Stolt's f-k migration for plane wave ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2014; 60(9):1853-67. PMC: 3970982. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2771. View

17.

Wang X, Kang L, Lan C . Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2014; 35(4):415-20. View

18.

Dhamija E, Paul S . Role of contrast enhanced ultrasound in hepatic imaging. Trop Gastroenterol. 2015; 35(3):141-51. DOI: 10.7869/tg.201. View

19.

Wang S, Yang W, Zhang H, Xu Q, Yan K . The Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Selection Indication and Improveing Diagnosis for Transthoracic Biopsy in Peripheral Pulmonary and Mediastinal Lesions. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:231782. PMC: 4450237. DOI: 10.1155/2015/231782. View

20.

Pitre-Champagnat S, Coiffier B, Jourdain L, Benatsou B, Leguerney I, Lassau N . Toward a Standardization of Ultrasound Scanners for Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography: Methodology and Phantoms. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017; 43(11):2670-2677. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.06.032. View